Perpetrator Programmes in Penal‐Welfare Governance: Variation in Programme Intake Across Italy

ABSTRACT Perpetrator programmes are an established component of institutional responses to violence against women. Drawing on the Italian case, this article examines how organisational and institutional configurations are associated with variation in programme intake. Using a national dataset of 94 identified programmes, we estimate two regression tree models, distinguishing between overall and criminal‐justice‐mediated intake. The fitted trees identify conditional in‐sample patterns but show negligible cross‐validated predictive performance. Overall intake is differentiated mainly by the number of access points and, among programmes with fewer access points, by financial resources. Criminal‐justice‐mediated intake is differentiated first by provincial population size and subsequently, depending on context, by funding, formal network representation, bilateral institutional ties and motivation‐based admission rules. Programme intake is conceptualised as an institutional outcome associated with context‐specific combinations of organisational resources and local integration. These exploratory patterns suggest that efforts to expand programme access should consider both available resources and reported institutional relationships within local violence response systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Policy and Administration
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/spol.70127
Primary Topic
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Perpetrator Programmes in Penal‐Welfare Governance: Variation in Programme Intake Across Italy

Pietro Demurtas, Stefano Daddi, Andrea Taddei
Social Policy and Administration
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
article

Perpetrator Programmes in Penal‐Welfare Governance: Variation in Programme Intake Across Italy

Pietro Demurtas, Stefano Daddi, Andrea Taddei
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Perpetrator programmes are an established component of institutional responses to violence against women. Drawing on the Italian case, this article examines how organisational and institutional configurations are associated with variation in programme intake. Using a national dataset of 94 identified programmes, we estimate two regression tree models, distinguishing between overall and criminal‐justice‐mediated intake. The fitted trees identify conditional in‐sample patterns but show negligible cross‐validated predictive performance. Overall intake is differentiated mainly by the number of access points and, among programmes with fewer access points, by financial resources. Criminal‐justice‐mediated intake is differentiated first by provincial population size and subsequently, depending on context, by funding, formal network representation, bilateral institutional ties and motivation‐based admission rules. Programme intake is conceptualised as an institutional outcome associated with context‐specific combinations of organisational resources and local integration. These exploratory patterns suggest that efforts to expand programme access should consider both available resources and reported institutional relationships within local violence response systems.

Social Policy and Administration
Istituto Nazionale di Statistica (IT), Institute for Research on Population and Social Policies (IT)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Reduced inequalities, Gender equality
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Intimate Partner and Family Violence
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.