An Open Data Approach for Comparing CO2 Sorbents

Abstract The rapid growth of research on CO2 capture has led to the development of hundreds of novel sorbents. Their direct comparison is challenging because the reported metrics, testing conditions, and data formats vary across studies. This study examines developments reported between 2021 and 2026 across seven major sorbent classes: amines, alkali-based sorbents, alkaline-earth sorbents, metal–organic frameworks, carbon materials, ionic liquids, and hybrid sorbents. Our statistical analysis demonstrated a substantial overlap in performance between these classes. Beyond maximum CO2 capture capacity alone, increasing attention is now being given to system-level descriptors, such as regeneration energy, sorption kinetics, cyclic stability, selectivity, scalability, and cost. To support consistent comparison of CO2 sorbents, we compiled data from the literature on more than 120 sorbents into an openly accessible, machine-readable data set. An accompanying interactive multidimensional tool enables application-driven sorbent selection. Together, the data set, statistical analysis, and open tool provide a practical basis for linking sorbent development with emerging CO2 capture technologies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
ACS Environmental Au
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1021/acsenvironau.6c00160
Primary Topic
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Open Data Approach for Comparing CO2 Sorbents

Nadežda Kongi, Iuliia Vetik, Vladislav Ivaništšev, Anna Stepanova et al.
ACS Environmental Au
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
article

An Open Data Approach for Comparing CO2 Sorbents

Nadežda Kongi, Iuliia Vetik, Vladislav Ivaništšev, Anna Stepanova, Margarita Burunova, Timmo-Hendrik Pukk, Karolina Kudelina-Zhang
article en

Abstract

Abstract The rapid growth of research on CO2 capture has led to the development of hundreds of novel sorbents. Their direct comparison is challenging because the reported metrics, testing conditions, and data formats vary across studies. This study examines developments reported between 2021 and 2026 across seven major sorbent classes: amines, alkali-based sorbents, alkaline-earth sorbents, metal–organic frameworks, carbon materials, ionic liquids, and hybrid sorbents. Our statistical analysis demonstrated a substantial overlap in performance between these classes. Beyond maximum CO2 capture capacity alone, increasing attention is now being given to system-level descriptors, such as regeneration energy, sorption kinetics, cyclic stability, selectivity, scalability, and cost. To support consistent comparison of CO2 sorbents, we compiled data from the literature on more than 120 sorbents into an openly accessible, machine-readable data set. An accompanying interactive multidimensional tool enables application-driven sorbent selection. Together, the data set, statistical analysis, and open tool provide a practical basis for linking sorbent development with emerging CO2 capture technologies.

ACS Environmental Au
University of Tartu (EE), University of Latvia (LV)
Eesti Teadusagentuur, Haridus- ja Teadusministeerium, Latvijas Universitate
Climate action
Openalex Percentile: Top 23%
Carbon Dioxide Capture Technologies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.