Exploring the Modalities of Combining Biological Models

Abstract This article examines how biological models are combined in biomedical research. It analyzes the notion of epistemological space, understood not as an abstract space of epistemic possibilities but as a framework for coordinating heterogeneous models through zones of partial compatibility structured by shared features, biological constraints, and research objectives. It also questions the ways in which models are combined, highlighting the methodological choices and epistemic commitments that guide pluralistic modeling practices. Finally, it proposes a representation of these modalities as a heuristic tool for comparing and reflecting on strategies of model combination.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Philosophy of Science
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1017/psa.2026.10290
Primary Topic
Philosophy and History of Science
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Exploring the Modalities of Combining Biological Models

Caroline Angleraux
Philosophy of Science
Philosophy and History of Science
article

Exploring the Modalities of Combining Biological Models

Caroline Angleraux
article en

Abstract

Abstract This article examines how biological models are combined in biomedical research. It analyzes the notion of epistemological space, understood not as an abstract space of epistemic possibilities but as a framework for coordinating heterogeneous models through zones of partial compatibility structured by shared features, biological constraints, and research objectives. It also questions the ways in which models are combined, highlighting the methodological choices and epistemic commitments that guide pluralistic modeling practices. Finally, it proposes a representation of these modalities as a heuristic tool for comparing and reflecting on strategies of model combination.

Philosophy of Science
Imaging, Brain, and Neuropsychiatry (FR)
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Philosophy and History of Science
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.