Predicting insulin resistance in non-diabetics

This cross-sectional study aimed to compare obesity indicators for predicting insulin resistance using machine learning. Data were obtained from NHANES 2015 to 2018, focusing on a nondiabetic adult population. Insulin resistance was defined as HOMA-IR ≥ 75th percentile of the training set. Key predictors were selected via bootstrap stability selection with elastic net. Logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were built using body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Race-stratified and nested regression analyses were performed. A total of 3562 subjects were included. BMI, WHtR, Glycated hemoglobin, and triglycerides were identified as key predictors. All models achieved AUC > 0.79; logistic regression (LR) performed best (BMI-based LR: AUC = 0.811; WHtR-based LR: AUC = 0.811). WHtR-based LR showed slightly better accuracy (0.746 vs 0.715) and specificity (0.744 vs 0.678). Obesity indicators had the highest feature importance, and race-stratified analyses confirmed general robustness across subgroups. WHtR and BMI are strong independent predictors of IR. LR models using these simple indices performed well in discrimination, calibration, and net benefit, offering cost-effective screening options, particularly where resources are scarce. Future work should prioritize external validation and race-specific thresholds.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Medicine
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/md.0000000000051034
Primary Topic
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Predicting insulin resistance in non-diabetics

Wang Chunhua, Yingfeng Wei, Xuechao Lu, Zhiyu Guo
Medicine
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
article

Predicting insulin resistance in non-diabetics

Wang Chunhua, Yingfeng Wei, Xuechao Lu, Zhiyu Guo
article en

Abstract

This cross-sectional study aimed to compare obesity indicators for predicting insulin resistance using machine learning. Data were obtained from NHANES 2015 to 2018, focusing on a nondiabetic adult population. Insulin resistance was defined as HOMA-IR ≥ 75th percentile of the training set. Key predictors were selected via bootstrap stability selection with elastic net. Logistic regression, random forest, and extreme gradient boosting (XGBoost) models were built using body mass index (BMI) and waist-to-height ratio (WHtR). Performance was assessed by area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, specificity, accuracy, calibration, and decision curve analysis. Race-stratified and nested regression analyses were performed. A total of 3562 subjects were included. BMI, WHtR, Glycated hemoglobin, and triglycerides were identified as key predictors. All models achieved AUC > 0.79; logistic regression (LR) performed best (BMI-based LR: AUC = 0.811; WHtR-based LR: AUC = 0.811). WHtR-based LR showed slightly better accuracy (0.746 vs 0.715) and specificity (0.744 vs 0.678). Obesity indicators had the highest feature importance, and race-stratified analyses confirmed general robustness across subgroups. WHtR and BMI are strong independent predictors of IR. LR models using these simple indices performed well in discrimination, calibration, and net benefit, offering cost-effective screening options, particularly where resources are scarce. Future work should prioritize external validation and race-specific thresholds.

MedicineVol. 105(42)
Nantong University (CN), Second People's Hospital of NanTong (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Diabetes, Cardiovascular Risks, and Lipoproteins
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.