Between Merit and Chance - Social Inequality and School Choice in Mexico City's Upper Secondary Education Admissions Reform

In 2025, the admission system for public upper secondary education in Mexico City was reformed, intending to end the use of the standardized test used to assign students to schools and replace it with a lottery. However, because the most selective high schools decided to keep the exam, the reform resulted in a two-track system: a test for the most selective ones and a lottery for the rest. This increased the differences in applying to each segment of schools in a context already marked by institutional heterogeneity and social segmentation in access to selective schools. While the reform aimed to increase equality of opportunity in the transition to upper secondary schooling, increased institutional heterogeneity changed the conditions under which applicants choose schools, leading them towards diverging decisions depending on their socioeconomic and educational backgrounds. Using rich administrative data and logistic regression, this thesis analyses how this reform affected the relationship between an applicant’s social origins and educational characteristics and their decision to apply to the schools that require an exam. It finds that under the new system, the share of applicants choosing exam schools decreased from 78.7% to 59.4%. This drop was associated with a strengthening of the link between applicants' social origins and educational characteristics and their choice of exam requirement schools, as these variables became stronger predictors in the new system. These findings highlight the difficulty of isolating the admissions reform, in its pursuit of equality of opportunity, from the broader inequalities it operates within. They also show how the design of educational systems interacts with social inequality, pointing to school heterogeneity and the dynamics that result in differences in students' social and educational characteristics as necessary targets for increasing equality of opportunity in the transition to upper secondary schooling.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University)
Published
2026-10-14
Primary Topic
School Choice and Performance
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Between Merit and Chance - Social Inequality and School Choice in Mexico City's Upper Secondary Education Admissions Reform

Pablo Clark-García
Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University)
School Choice and Performance
article

Between Merit and Chance - Social Inequality and School Choice in Mexico City's Upper Secondary Education Admissions Reform

Pablo Clark-García
article en

Abstract

In 2025, the admission system for public upper secondary education in Mexico City was reformed, intending to end the use of the standardized test used to assign students to schools and replace it with a lottery. However, because the most selective high schools decided to keep the exam, the reform resulted in a two-track system: a test for the most selective ones and a lottery for the rest. This increased the differences in applying to each segment of schools in a context already marked by institutional heterogeneity and social segmentation in access to selective schools. While the reform aimed to increase equality of opportunity in the transition to upper secondary schooling, increased institutional heterogeneity changed the conditions under which applicants choose schools, leading them towards diverging decisions depending on their socioeconomic and educational backgrounds. Using rich administrative data and logistic regression, this thesis analyses how this reform affected the relationship between an applicant’s social origins and educational characteristics and their decision to apply to the schools that require an exam. It finds that under the new system, the share of applicants choosing exam schools decreased from 78.7% to 59.4%. This drop was associated with a strengthening of the link between applicants' social origins and educational characteristics and their choice of exam requirement schools, as these variables became stronger predictors in the new system. These findings highlight the difficulty of isolating the admissions reform, in its pursuit of equality of opportunity, from the broader inequalities it operates within. They also show how the design of educational systems interacts with social inequality, pointing to school heterogeneity and the dynamics that result in differences in students' social and educational characteristics as necessary targets for increasing equality of opportunity in the transition to upper secondary schooling.

Gothenburg University Publications Electronic Archive (Gothenburg University)
Openalex Percentile: Top 3%
School Choice and Performance
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.