Health literacy, exercise self-efficacy, and physical activity in university students: a cross-sectional study

Background Evidence of the association between health literacy and physical activity is inconsistent. Health literacy may support healthy behavior, but social cognitive theory suggests that acting on health information also depends on confidence to initiate and persist despite barriers. Exercise self-efficacy may therefore help explain when health literacy is associated with greater physical activity. We tested whether adding exercise self-efficacy improved models for weekly physical activity and estimated the cross-sectional indirect association between health literacy and physical activity via exercise self-efficacy. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of 592 students at a large Midwestern public university in 2025 (median age = 18 years; 70.8% female). We assessed weekly physical activity using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form, alongside perceived digital and general health literacy, performance-based functional health literacy, and exercise self-efficacy. We compared a health literacy-centered model and a self-efficacy-extended model using structural equation modeling, 5,000-resample bootstrap confidence intervals, and repeated 10-fold cross-validation with five repeats using held-out predictive R 2 . Results Adding exercise self-efficacy improved total-activity models across all three health literacy measures (bootstrapped Δ R 2 = 0.112–0.128; mean pooled out-of-fold predictive Δ R 2 = 0.110–0.127). Estimation of standardized indirect associations via exercise self-efficacy supported digital health literacy ( β = 0.051, 95% CI = 0.017 to 0.090) and general health literacy ( β = 0.067, 95% CI = 0.031 to 0.107), but not functional health literacy ( β = 0.002, 95% CI = −0.029 to 0.032). Exploratory analyses by activity intensity provided evidence of associations for vigorous and moderate activity, whereas estimates for walking did not survive false discovery rate control. Sensitivity analyses using an alternate specification of total activity yielded the same qualitative pattern. Conclusion Exercise self-efficacy improved models of physical activity across all three health literacy measures, while evidence supported indirect associations for perceived digital and general health literacy but not for performance-based functional health literacy. Exploratory analyses provided evidence of associations for moderate and vigorous activity, but the cross-sectional design precludes causal or temporal interpretation of the indirect associations.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Frontiers in Psychology
Published
2026-10-30
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2026.1863857
Primary Topic
Physical Activity and Health
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Health literacy, exercise self-efficacy, and physical activity in university students: a cross-sectional study

Ben Allen
Frontiers in Psychology
Physical Activity and Health
article

Health literacy, exercise self-efficacy, and physical activity in university students: a cross-sectional study

Ben Allen
article en

Abstract

Background Evidence of the association between health literacy and physical activity is inconsistent. Health literacy may support healthy behavior, but social cognitive theory suggests that acting on health information also depends on confidence to initiate and persist despite barriers. Exercise self-efficacy may therefore help explain when health literacy is associated with greater physical activity. We tested whether adding exercise self-efficacy improved models for weekly physical activity and estimated the cross-sectional indirect association between health literacy and physical activity via exercise self-efficacy. Methods We conducted a cross-sectional study of 592 students at a large Midwestern public university in 2025 (median age = 18 years; 70.8% female). We assessed weekly physical activity using the International Physical Activity Questionnaire Short Form, alongside perceived digital and general health literacy, performance-based functional health literacy, and exercise self-efficacy. We compared a health literacy-centered model and a self-efficacy-extended model using structural equation modeling, 5,000-resample bootstrap confidence intervals, and repeated 10-fold cross-validation with five repeats using held-out predictive R 2 . Results Adding exercise self-efficacy improved total-activity models across all three health literacy measures (bootstrapped Δ R 2 = 0.112–0.128; mean pooled out-of-fold predictive Δ R 2 = 0.110–0.127). Estimation of standardized indirect associations via exercise self-efficacy supported digital health literacy ( β = 0.051, 95% CI = 0.017 to 0.090) and general health literacy ( β = 0.067, 95% CI = 0.031 to 0.107), but not functional health literacy ( β = 0.002, 95% CI = −0.029 to 0.032). Exploratory analyses by activity intensity provided evidence of associations for vigorous and moderate activity, whereas estimates for walking did not survive false discovery rate control. Sensitivity analyses using an alternate specification of total activity yielded the same qualitative pattern. Conclusion Exercise self-efficacy improved models of physical activity across all three health literacy measures, while evidence supported indirect associations for perceived digital and general health literacy but not for performance-based functional health literacy. Exploratory analyses provided evidence of associations for moderate and vigorous activity, but the cross-sectional design precludes causal or temporal interpretation of the indirect associations.

Frontiers in PsychologyVol. 17
University of Kansas (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Physical Activity and Health
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.

Laika access coming soon