A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN CITIZENSHIP LAWS OF PAKISTAN UNDER ARTICLES 25 AND 35

The legal, political and social rights of citizens depend on citizenship. In Pakistan, however, the laws of citizenship remain open to gender discrimination, especially in respect of the transfer of citizenship to foreign spouses. This study examines the issues of disparities between the provisions in Pakistan Citizenship Act 1951 and the constitution as embodied in Article 25 and 35. The paper considers statutory provisions, the evolution of judicial trends and international human rights obligations from a doctrinal and socio-legal perspective. It claims that the restrictions are not only equalitarian and family protection violations of the Constitution but they also create structural inequality. The study finally makes recommendations for gender neutral reforms that are in line with the constitutional requirements and international standards.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Perspectives in Social Sciences
Published
2026-10-14
Primary Topic
Discrimination and Equality Law
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN CITIZENSHIP LAWS OF PAKISTAN UNDER ARTICLES 25 AND 35

Aisha Nayab Qureshi, Dr. Ashraf Ali
Perspectives in Social Sciences
Discrimination and Equality Law
article

A CONSTITUTIONAL ANALYSIS OF GENDER DISCRIMINATION IN CITIZENSHIP LAWS OF PAKISTAN UNDER ARTICLES 25 AND 35

Aisha Nayab Qureshi, Dr. Ashraf Ali
article en

Abstract

The legal, political and social rights of citizens depend on citizenship. In Pakistan, however, the laws of citizenship remain open to gender discrimination, especially in respect of the transfer of citizenship to foreign spouses. This study examines the issues of disparities between the provisions in Pakistan Citizenship Act 1951 and the constitution as embodied in Article 25 and 35. The paper considers statutory provisions, the evolution of judicial trends and international human rights obligations from a doctrinal and socio-legal perspective. It claims that the restrictions are not only equalitarian and family protection violations of the Constitution but they also create structural inequality. The study finally makes recommendations for gender neutral reforms that are in line with the constitutional requirements and international standards.

Perspectives in Social Sciences
Openalex Percentile: Top 2%
Discrimination and Equality Law
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.