Prescription Patterns in Terminal Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study in a Low- and Middle-Income Country Setting

Objectives: The objective of the study is to evaluate prescription patterns from admission (Ta) to discharge/death (Td), assess associations between symptom burden and medication use and identify significant co-prescription patterns contributing to polypharmacy. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in an acute palliative care unit of a tertiary cancer hospital (n = 219). Medications were categorised using the World Health Organization anatomical therapeutic chemical codes. Symptom burden was assessed at Ta using the Symptom Assessment Scale. McNemar and Chi-square tests examined changes in prescribing; Pearson correlation assessed relationships between symptom burden and medication use. Results: Polypharmacy was common (mean ~7.5 medications) throughout admission. Opioids (73%), antacids (68%), laxatives (48.9%) and corticosteroids (48.9%) were most frequent at Td. Significant co-prescription patterns included prophylactic combinations (opioid-laxative, corticosteroid-antiulcer, non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs–antiulcer; p < 0.05), symptom cluster management (opioid-anxiolytic, opioid-propulsives; p < 0.001) and potential medication-induced prescribing patterns (gabapentinoid-diuretic; p = 0.035). Individual symptoms predicted the use of relevant medication classes, but overall symptom burden did not predict total medication load at Td (r = 0.056, p = 0.408), indicating cascade-driven rather than symptom-driven polypharmacy. Only 63.6% of medications aligned with the International Association of Hospice and Palliative Care Essential Medicines List. Conclusion: Persistent polypharmacy and identifiable preventive co-prescribing patterns suggest opportunities for targeted interventions, including structured deprescribing, pharmacist-led reviews and development of LMIC-specific essential medicines lists.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.25259/ijpc_453_2025
Primary Topic
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prescription Patterns in Terminal Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study in a Low- and Middle-Income Country Setting

Divya Sai Vanumu, Praneeth Suvvari, Basanth Kumar Rayani, Praveen Kumar Kodisharapu
Indian Journal of Palliative Care
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
article

Prescription Patterns in Terminal Cancer Patients: A Prospective Study in a Low- and Middle-Income Country Setting

Divya Sai Vanumu, Praneeth Suvvari, Basanth Kumar Rayani, Praveen Kumar Kodisharapu
article en

Abstract

Objectives: The objective of the study is to evaluate prescription patterns from admission (Ta) to discharge/death (Td), assess associations between symptom burden and medication use and identify significant co-prescription patterns contributing to polypharmacy. Materials and Methods: A prospective observational cohort study was conducted in an acute palliative care unit of a tertiary cancer hospital (n = 219). Medications were categorised using the World Health Organization anatomical therapeutic chemical codes. Symptom burden was assessed at Ta using the Symptom Assessment Scale. McNemar and Chi-square tests examined changes in prescribing; Pearson correlation assessed relationships between symptom burden and medication use. Results: Polypharmacy was common (mean ~7.5 medications) throughout admission. Opioids (73%), antacids (68%), laxatives (48.9%) and corticosteroids (48.9%) were most frequent at Td. Significant co-prescription patterns included prophylactic combinations (opioid-laxative, corticosteroid-antiulcer, non steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs–antiulcer; p < 0.05), symptom cluster management (opioid-anxiolytic, opioid-propulsives; p < 0.001) and potential medication-induced prescribing patterns (gabapentinoid-diuretic; p = 0.035). Individual symptoms predicted the use of relevant medication classes, but overall symptom burden did not predict total medication load at Td (r = 0.056, p = 0.408), indicating cascade-driven rather than symptom-driven polypharmacy. Only 63.6% of medications aligned with the International Association of Hospice and Palliative Care Essential Medicines List. Conclusion: Persistent polypharmacy and identifiable preventive co-prescribing patterns suggest opportunities for targeted interventions, including structured deprescribing, pharmacist-led reviews and development of LMIC-specific essential medicines lists.

Indian Journal of Palliative CareVol. 0
MNJ Institute Of Oncology and Regional Cancer Centre (IN), Basavatarakam Indo American Cancer Hospital and Research Institute (IN), Cancer Hospital and Research Institute (IN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Pharmaceutical Practices and Patient Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.