Speech Perception in Noise in Individuals With Tinnitus: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate speech-in-noise and spatial listening performance in patients with tinnitus by examining the potential contributions of top-down and bottom-up processes. DESIGN: Thirty-one patients with tinnitus and 31 age-matched controls without tinnitus (participants with normal hearing), aged 18 to 60 years, underwent audiological evaluation. All participants completed the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Universal Test to assess speech-in-noise performance under different spatial conditions and cognitive tests (Serial Digit Learning and Stroop) to assess attention and memory. RESULTS: Hearing thresholds did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05), although a significant main effect of frequency was observed (p < 0.001). Participants with tinnitus demonstrated poorer speech-in-noise performance than controls across both colocated and spatially separated listening conditions [F(1,60) = 12.53, p = 0.001], whereas spatial advantage (t = 1.08, p = 0.28) and cognitive performance (all p > 0.05) were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tinnitus demonstrated poorer speech-in-noise performance than controls in both spatially separated and colocated listening conditions. Spatial advantage and cognitive test performance were comparable between groups, suggesting that the between-group difference in speech-in-noise performance was evident across both listening conditions rather than being limited to spatial cue utilization.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Ear and Hearing
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/aud.0000000000001896
Primary Topic
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Speech Perception in Noise in Individuals With Tinnitus: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes

Halime Sümeyra Sevmez, Meral Didem Türkyılmaz, Emre Gürses, Harvey Dillon et al.
Ear and Hearing
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
article

Speech Perception in Noise in Individuals With Tinnitus: Top-Down and Bottom-Up Processes

Halime Sümeyra Sevmez, Meral Didem Türkyılmaz, Emre Gürses, Harvey Dillon, Hatice Merve Yücel
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To evaluate speech-in-noise and spatial listening performance in patients with tinnitus by examining the potential contributions of top-down and bottom-up processes. DESIGN: Thirty-one patients with tinnitus and 31 age-matched controls without tinnitus (participants with normal hearing), aged 18 to 60 years, underwent audiological evaluation. All participants completed the Listening in Spatialized Noise-Universal Test to assess speech-in-noise performance under different spatial conditions and cognitive tests (Serial Digit Learning and Stroop) to assess attention and memory. RESULTS: Hearing thresholds did not differ significantly between groups (p > 0.05), although a significant main effect of frequency was observed (p < 0.001). Participants with tinnitus demonstrated poorer speech-in-noise performance than controls across both colocated and spatially separated listening conditions [F(1,60) = 12.53, p = 0.001], whereas spatial advantage (t = 1.08, p = 0.28) and cognitive performance (all p > 0.05) were comparable between groups. CONCLUSIONS: Patients with tinnitus demonstrated poorer speech-in-noise performance than controls in both spatially separated and colocated listening conditions. Spatial advantage and cognitive test performance were comparable between groups, suggesting that the between-group difference in speech-in-noise performance was evident across both listening conditions rather than being limited to spatial cue utilization.

Ear and Hearing
Ankara University (TR), University of Manchester (GB), Hacettepe University (TR), Macquarie University (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Hearing, Cochlea, Tinnitus, Genetics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.