Quality of recovery after arthroscopic meniscectomy with remimazolam or propofol anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic technique may influence postoperative quality of recovery (QoR). Remimazolam may offer hemodynamic stability and favorable early recovery characteristics, but its effect on patient-reported QoR compared with propofol remains unclear. This is particularly relevant in minor orthopedic surgery, where QoR is a principal outcome. This randomized controlled trial compared postoperative QoR between propofol-based and remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using the QoR-40 questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty adult patients undergoing elective arthroscopic meniscectomy were randomly assigned to propofol-based or remimazolam-based TIVA; 71 patients completed the QoR-40 questionnaire and were included in the final analysis (36 in the Propofol group, 35 in the Remimazolam group). The primary outcome was the global QoR-40 score on postoperative day (POD) 1. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic variables, anesthetic and analgesic requirements, postoperative recovery profiles, pain scores, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Global QoR-40 scores on POD 1 did not differ significantly between the Propofol and Remimazolam groups (166.1 ± 16.8 vs. 170.6 ± 13.6; mean difference -4.5, 95% CI -11.8 to 2.7; P = 0.218). In an exploratory analysis, the emotional-state domain scores were higher in the Remimazolam group (37.0 ± 4.3 vs. 39.2 ± 2.5; mean difference -2.2, 95% CI -3.9 to -0.6; P = 0.009). The Remimazolam group had a longer time to full alertness (18 [15-24] vs. 37 [31-45] min; P < 0.001) and longer post-anesthesia care unit stay (30 [30-39] vs. 38 [30-50] min; P = 0.008). Intraoperative hypotension requiring ephedrine occurred more frequently in the Propofol group (44.4% vs. 17.1%; P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Global QoR-40 scores on POD 1 did not differ significantly between propofol-based and remimazolam-based TIVA in adults undergoing elective arthroscopic meniscectomy, although remimazolam was associated with greater intraoperative hemodynamic stability at the cost of slower return to full alertness.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
PLoS ONE
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0360759
Primary Topic
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Quality of recovery after arthroscopic meniscectomy with remimazolam or propofol anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial

Seokyung Shin, Ha Yan Kim, Eun-Ah Cho, Yangjin Kim
PLoS ONE
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
article

Quality of recovery after arthroscopic meniscectomy with remimazolam or propofol anesthesia: A randomized controlled trial

Seokyung Shin, Ha Yan Kim, Eun-Ah Cho, Yangjin Kim
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Anesthetic technique may influence postoperative quality of recovery (QoR). Remimazolam may offer hemodynamic stability and favorable early recovery characteristics, but its effect on patient-reported QoR compared with propofol remains unclear. This is particularly relevant in minor orthopedic surgery, where QoR is a principal outcome. This randomized controlled trial compared postoperative QoR between propofol-based and remimazolam-based total intravenous anesthesia (TIVA) using the QoR-40 questionnaire. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty adult patients undergoing elective arthroscopic meniscectomy were randomly assigned to propofol-based or remimazolam-based TIVA; 71 patients completed the QoR-40 questionnaire and were included in the final analysis (36 in the Propofol group, 35 in the Remimazolam group). The primary outcome was the global QoR-40 score on postoperative day (POD) 1. Secondary outcomes included intraoperative hemodynamic variables, anesthetic and analgesic requirements, postoperative recovery profiles, pain scores, and postoperative nausea and vomiting. RESULTS: Global QoR-40 scores on POD 1 did not differ significantly between the Propofol and Remimazolam groups (166.1 ± 16.8 vs. 170.6 ± 13.6; mean difference -4.5, 95% CI -11.8 to 2.7; P = 0.218). In an exploratory analysis, the emotional-state domain scores were higher in the Remimazolam group (37.0 ± 4.3 vs. 39.2 ± 2.5; mean difference -2.2, 95% CI -3.9 to -0.6; P = 0.009). The Remimazolam group had a longer time to full alertness (18 [15-24] vs. 37 [31-45] min; P < 0.001) and longer post-anesthesia care unit stay (30 [30-39] vs. 38 [30-50] min; P = 0.008). Intraoperative hypotension requiring ephedrine occurred more frequently in the Propofol group (44.4% vs. 17.1%; P = 0.013). CONCLUSIONS: Global QoR-40 scores on POD 1 did not differ significantly between propofol-based and remimazolam-based TIVA in adults undergoing elective arthroscopic meniscectomy, although remimazolam was associated with greater intraoperative hemodynamic stability at the cost of slower return to full alertness.

PLoS ONEVol. 21(10)
Yonsei University (KR), Severance Hospital (KR), Kangbuk Samsung Hospital (KR), Gangnam Severance Hospital (KR), Sungkyunkwan University (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Anesthesia and Sedative Agents
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.