Review Article: Socioeconomic and Racial or Ethnic Inequalities Across the Colorectal Cancer Continuum: From Disparities to Action

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic and racial or ethnic inequalities affect colorectal cancer (CRC) across the care continuum. Although increasingly documented, whether current interventions effectively reduce these inequalities remains uncertain. AIMS: To review socioeconomic and racial or ethnic inequalities in CRC incidence, screening and diagnosis, treatment, surveillance and survival and assess interventions designed to reduce them. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review of adult studies published in English between January 2000 and March 2026. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched for studies addressing socioeconomic or racial and ethnic disparities in CRC, using a saturation approach. RESULTS: Socioeconomic disadvantage and belonging to some racial or ethnic minority groups were associated with higher CRC incidence within high-income countries, lower screening participation, later diagnosis, less timely or guideline-concordant treatment, poorer surveillance and worse survival. In the USA, five-year survival was 60.6% among Black patients versus 66.7% among White patients, with little improvement in this gap over several decades. Inequalities at successive stages may contribute to cumulative disadvantage. Intervention evidence was markedly uneven across the continuum. Mailed stool-test outreach and patient navigation increased screening among underserved populations, whereas evidence for interventions specifically reducing inequalities in treatment, surveillance, and broader survivorship was sparse. CONCLUSIONS: Improving overall CRC prevention and care cannot be assumed to reduce inequalities. The major evidence gap has shifted from documenting disparities towards demonstrating how to reduce them, particularly beyond screening. Equity should become an explicit outcome of CRC research, implementation, healthcare quality assessment and clinical guidelines.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/apt.71021
Primary Topic
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Review Article: Socioeconomic and Racial or Ethnic Inequalities Across the Colorectal Cancer Continuum: From Disparities to Action

Alan N. Barkun, Nicolas Chapelle, Myriam Martel, Marc Bardou
Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
article

Review Article: Socioeconomic and Racial or Ethnic Inequalities Across the Colorectal Cancer Continuum: From Disparities to Action

Alan N. Barkun, Nicolas Chapelle, Myriam Martel, Marc Bardou
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Socioeconomic and racial or ethnic inequalities affect colorectal cancer (CRC) across the care continuum. Although increasingly documented, whether current interventions effectively reduce these inequalities remains uncertain. AIMS: To review socioeconomic and racial or ethnic inequalities in CRC incidence, screening and diagnosis, treatment, surveillance and survival and assess interventions designed to reduce them. METHODS: We conducted a narrative review of adult studies published in English between January 2000 and March 2026. MEDLINE, EMBASE, PubMed, and ISI Web of Knowledge were searched for studies addressing socioeconomic or racial and ethnic disparities in CRC, using a saturation approach. RESULTS: Socioeconomic disadvantage and belonging to some racial or ethnic minority groups were associated with higher CRC incidence within high-income countries, lower screening participation, later diagnosis, less timely or guideline-concordant treatment, poorer surveillance and worse survival. In the USA, five-year survival was 60.6% among Black patients versus 66.7% among White patients, with little improvement in this gap over several decades. Inequalities at successive stages may contribute to cumulative disadvantage. Intervention evidence was markedly uneven across the continuum. Mailed stool-test outreach and patient navigation increased screening among underserved populations, whereas evidence for interventions specifically reducing inequalities in treatment, surveillance, and broader survivorship was sparse. CONCLUSIONS: Improving overall CRC prevention and care cannot be assumed to reduce inequalities. The major evidence gap has shifted from documenting disparities towards demonstrating how to reduce them, particularly beyond screening. Equity should become an explicit outcome of CRC research, implementation, healthcare quality assessment and clinical guidelines.

Alimentary Pharmacology & Therapeutics
Inserm (FR), Université de Bourgogne (FR), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Centre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nantes (FR), Institut de Transplantation Urologie en Nephrologie (FR), CHU Dijon Bourgogne (FR), Centre d'Investigation Clinique de Nantes (FR), McGill University (CA)
Openalex Percentile: Top 16%
Colorectal Cancer Screening and Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.