Detecting and Localizing Objects With Color-Contrast With a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis

Purpose: To assess the detection of color contrast in retinal prosthesis users by evaluating a novel Detecting Objects with Color-Contrast (DOCC) vision processing algorithm. Methods: Three participants monocularly implanted with a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (NCT03406416) were asked to locate and identify objects on a tabletop that were color-contrasted with their backgrounds using the DOCC algorithm, a control algorithm (Lanczos2 [L2]) and system off. The task involved two setups; (i) high-contrast white-on-black objects, and (ii) low-grayscale-contrast (color-only contrast) red-on-green objects. Participants were required to verbally localize (nine alternative forced choice), then touch the object, with the distance measured from their finger to the true object location. Results: For low- (color-only) contrast objects, DOCC (58.3% ± 43.0%) performed better than L2 (27.9% ± 42.5%) for verbally localizing objects (P < 0.0001) and both DOCC (P < 0.0001) and L2 (P = 0.0018) performed better than system off (9.1% ± 33.1%). Furthermore, DOCC (9.7 ± 10.6 cm) had a closer final proximity to the object than L2 (28.0 ± 24.7 cm; P < 0.0001) and system off (45.0 ± 23.9 cm; P < 0.0001). For high-contrast objects, DOCC (59.8% ± 47.8%) performed similarly to L2 (60.8% ± 48.3%) and system off (25.4% ± 41.8%) for verbally localizing objects (P = 0.32, three-condition). Likewise, for final object proximity, DOCC (8.0 ± 7.5 cm) also performed similarly to L2 (6.2 ± 8.4 cm, P = 0.43), whereas both DOCC (P = 0.0014) and L2 (P < 0.0001) performed better than system off (25.6 ± 22.3 cm). Conclusions: Vision processing software can improve object detection and localization for objects of one color against a low-contrast background of another color. Translational Relevance: A color-contrast algorithm may assist retinal prosthesis users with detecting and localizing objects that are color-contrasted to their background.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1167/tvst.15.10.21
Primary Topic
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Detecting and Localizing Objects With Color-Contrast With a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis

Maria Kolic, Janine G. Walker, Penelope J. Allen, Samuel A. Titchener et al.
Translational Vision Science & Technology
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
article

Detecting and Localizing Objects With Color-Contrast With a Second-Generation (44-Channel) Suprachoroidal Retinal Prosthesis

Maria Kolic, Janine G. Walker, Penelope J. Allen, Samuel A. Titchener, William G. Kentler, Nick M. Barnes, Carla J. Abbott, Elizabeth K. Baglin, Matthew A. Petoe, Nariman Habili
article en

Abstract

Purpose: To assess the detection of color contrast in retinal prosthesis users by evaluating a novel Detecting Objects with Color-Contrast (DOCC) vision processing algorithm. Methods: Three participants monocularly implanted with a suprachoroidal retinal prosthesis (NCT03406416) were asked to locate and identify objects on a tabletop that were color-contrasted with their backgrounds using the DOCC algorithm, a control algorithm (Lanczos2 [L2]) and system off. The task involved two setups; (i) high-contrast white-on-black objects, and (ii) low-grayscale-contrast (color-only contrast) red-on-green objects. Participants were required to verbally localize (nine alternative forced choice), then touch the object, with the distance measured from their finger to the true object location. Results: For low- (color-only) contrast objects, DOCC (58.3% ± 43.0%) performed better than L2 (27.9% ± 42.5%) for verbally localizing objects (P < 0.0001) and both DOCC (P < 0.0001) and L2 (P = 0.0018) performed better than system off (9.1% ± 33.1%). Furthermore, DOCC (9.7 ± 10.6 cm) had a closer final proximity to the object than L2 (28.0 ± 24.7 cm; P < 0.0001) and system off (45.0 ± 23.9 cm; P < 0.0001). For high-contrast objects, DOCC (59.8% ± 47.8%) performed similarly to L2 (60.8% ± 48.3%) and system off (25.4% ± 41.8%) for verbally localizing objects (P = 0.32, three-condition). Likewise, for final object proximity, DOCC (8.0 ± 7.5 cm) also performed similarly to L2 (6.2 ± 8.4 cm, P = 0.43), whereas both DOCC (P = 0.0014) and L2 (P < 0.0001) performed better than system off (25.6 ± 22.3 cm). Conclusions: Vision processing software can improve object detection and localization for objects of one color against a low-contrast background of another color. Translational Relevance: A color-contrast algorithm may assist retinal prosthesis users with detecting and localizing objects that are color-contrasted to their background.

Translational Vision Science & TechnologyVol. 15(10)
Australian National University (AU), Bionics Institute (AU), The University of Melbourne (AU), Florey Institute of Neuroscience and Mental Health (AU), The Royal Victorian Eye & Ear Hospital (AU), Health Sciences and Nutrition (AU), Centre for Eye Research Australia (AU), CSIRO Health and Biosecurity (AU), Melbourne Clinic (AU)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 20%
Neuroscience and Neural Engineering
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.