Centering AI Within the Political Economy of Housing

My commentary seeks to re-embed automated mortgage futures and the prospects of AI envisioned by Richard Burrows and his colleagues within the 21st century political economy of housing. First, I suggest treating property markets as historical and ongoing sites of multisided datafication and acute social classification, in order to situate how granular data and algorithms reshape market structures and housing politics, and how algorithmic systems transforms the construction of mortgages and risk, along with the creation and destruction of housing wealth. Second, I argue that fairness and privacy, while important for regulation, become an analytical trap in pursuing fairer housing futures once data externalities and organizational dynamics are taken into account. Finally, I discuss why, in the era of big geodata, shifting insurance interests, and heightened climate risks, foregrounding a spatial approach is necessary to enrich our understanding of mortgage futures and the inequalities they renew and lock in.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Housing Theory and Society
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/14036096.2026.2748417
Primary Topic
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Centering AI Within the Political Economy of Housing

Julien Migozzi
Housing Theory and Society
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
article

Centering AI Within the Political Economy of Housing

Julien Migozzi
article en

Abstract

My commentary seeks to re-embed automated mortgage futures and the prospects of AI envisioned by Richard Burrows and his colleagues within the 21st century political economy of housing. First, I suggest treating property markets as historical and ongoing sites of multisided datafication and acute social classification, in order to situate how granular data and algorithms reshape market structures and housing politics, and how algorithmic systems transforms the construction of mortgages and risk, along with the creation and destruction of housing wealth. Second, I argue that fairness and privacy, while important for regulation, become an analytical trap in pursuing fairer housing futures once data externalities and organizational dynamics are taken into account. Finally, I discuss why, in the era of big geodata, shifting insurance interests, and heightened climate risks, foregrounding a spatial approach is necessary to enrich our understanding of mortgage futures and the inequalities they renew and lock in.

Housing Theory and Society
University of Cambridge (GB)
Urban Studies Foundation
Reduced inequalities
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Housing, Finance, and Neoliberalism
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.