Expert Histopathologic Evaluation and Molecular Analyses for Ambiguous Cutaneous Melanocytic Tumors

PURPOSE: A subset of cutaneous melanocytic tumors has ambiguous histopathologic features that preclude reliable classification as benign or malignant. We evaluated the diagnostic yield and long-term clinical validity of expert histopathologic evaluation and, when inconclusive, additional molecular analyses in patients with ambiguous primary cutaneous melanocytic tumors. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients with primary cutaneous melanocytic tumors deemed ambiguous by referring pathologists were evaluated at a tertiary dermatopathology referral center in the Netherlands from September 2018 through December 2021. Tumors underwent expert histopathologic evaluation, with next-generation sequencing, single-nucleotide polymorphism array, and targeted RNA sequencing when inconclusive. Tumors were classified as nonmelanoma, melanoma, or borderline melanoma. Clinical validity was assessed by melanoma-related events during follow-up. RESULTS: Among 258,562 patients with excised melanocytic tumors nationwide, 2,685 (1.0%) had ambiguous tumors. We included 994 patients and reached a diagnosis in 966 (97.2%): 417 (42.0%) after expert histopathologic evaluation alone and 549 (55.2%) after additional molecular analyses. Among 608 patients (61.2%) with a nonmelanoma diagnosis, no melanoma-related events occurred during median follow-up of 5.4 years (incidence, 0.0%; 95% CI, 0.0 to 0.6). Among 358 patients (36.0%) with a melanoma diagnosis, 33 of 186 (17.7%) had a positive sentinel node biopsy, and 20 developed melanoma-related events during median follow-up of 5.0 years (cumulative incidence, 5.7%; 95% CI, 3.3 to 8.1). No events occurred in 28 patients (2.8%) with a borderline melanoma diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Expert histopathologic evaluation combined with molecular analyses provided a definitive diagnosis in nearly all patients with ambiguous primary cutaneous melanocytic tumors. Long-term follow-up supported the clinical validity of this stepwise diagnostic approach.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1200/jco-26-00432
Primary Topic
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Expert Histopathologic Evaluation and Molecular Analyses for Ambiguous Cutaneous Melanocytic Tumors

Marijke R. van Dijk, Willeke A.M. Blokx, Chiel F Ebbelaar, Lourens T. Bloem et al.
Journal of Clinical Oncology
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
article

Expert Histopathologic Evaluation and Molecular Analyses for Ambiguous Cutaneous Melanocytic Tumors

Marijke R. van Dijk, Willeke A.M. Blokx, Chiel F Ebbelaar, Lourens T. Bloem, Remco van Doorn, Anne M.L. Jansen, Anne M.R. Schrader, Gerben Eise Breimer, Karijn P.M. Suijkerbuijk, Wendy W.J. de Leng, Anthonie W.A. Lensing, Martin H. Prins, MOLecular Evaluation of Melanocytic Ambiguous Tumors (MOLEMAT) Investigators
article en

Abstract

PURPOSE: A subset of cutaneous melanocytic tumors has ambiguous histopathologic features that preclude reliable classification as benign or malignant. We evaluated the diagnostic yield and long-term clinical validity of expert histopathologic evaluation and, when inconclusive, additional molecular analyses in patients with ambiguous primary cutaneous melanocytic tumors. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, consecutive patients with primary cutaneous melanocytic tumors deemed ambiguous by referring pathologists were evaluated at a tertiary dermatopathology referral center in the Netherlands from September 2018 through December 2021. Tumors underwent expert histopathologic evaluation, with next-generation sequencing, single-nucleotide polymorphism array, and targeted RNA sequencing when inconclusive. Tumors were classified as nonmelanoma, melanoma, or borderline melanoma. Clinical validity was assessed by melanoma-related events during follow-up. RESULTS: Among 258,562 patients with excised melanocytic tumors nationwide, 2,685 (1.0%) had ambiguous tumors. We included 994 patients and reached a diagnosis in 966 (97.2%): 417 (42.0%) after expert histopathologic evaluation alone and 549 (55.2%) after additional molecular analyses. Among 608 patients (61.2%) with a nonmelanoma diagnosis, no melanoma-related events occurred during median follow-up of 5.4 years (incidence, 0.0%; 95% CI, 0.0 to 0.6). Among 358 patients (36.0%) with a melanoma diagnosis, 33 of 186 (17.7%) had a positive sentinel node biopsy, and 20 developed melanoma-related events during median follow-up of 5.0 years (cumulative incidence, 5.7%; 95% CI, 3.3 to 8.1). No events occurred in 28 patients (2.8%) with a borderline melanoma diagnosis. CONCLUSION: Expert histopathologic evaluation combined with molecular analyses provided a definitive diagnosis in nearly all patients with ambiguous primary cutaneous melanocytic tumors. Long-term follow-up supported the clinical validity of this stepwise diagnostic approach.

Journal of Clinical Oncology
Utrecht University (NL), Leiden University Medical Center (NL), The Netherlands Cancer Institute (NL), University Medical Center Utrecht (NL), Maastricht University (NL)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 17%
Cutaneous Melanoma Detection and Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.