Corporate social responsibility in South‐East Europe: A cross‐national review

Abstract Scholars have called for the corporate social responsibility (CSR) discourse to be advanced by exploring CSR in different countries. Accordingly, this review presents cross‐national differences in CSR among four South‐East European (SEE) countries—Kosovo, Albania, Croatia and Greece. It addresses the state of the academic literature on CSR in SEE and probes what this literature reveals about the understanding and implementation of CSR in the region. An analysis of 45 CSR‐focused articles across these four SEE countries was undertaken using critical interpretive synthesis (CIS). The academic literature indicates that CSR research in SEE is at an embryonic stage. Similarly, CSR awareness in the region is lower than in other European countries. All four SEE countries demonstrate slow CSR adoption, but differences in implementation arise from their unique national contexts and levels of regional institutionalisation. This review emphasises the importance of a country's level of development for the application of CSR and highlights differences between developed (Greece and Croatia) and developing (Kosovo and Albania) countries. It proposes a typology of CSR practices across four actor levels—(1) company, (2) national, (3) regional and (4) international—and presents a conceptual framework illustrating institutional pressures at each level. Finally, it offers directions for future research to scholars interested in the region and provides guidance for SEE companies seeking to embrace CSR.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Management Review
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/emre.70111
Primary Topic
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Corporate social responsibility in South‐East Europe: A cross‐national review

Natyra Xharavina, Caroline J. Oates, Alexandros Kapoulas
European Management Review
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
article

Corporate social responsibility in South‐East Europe: A cross‐national review

Natyra Xharavina, Caroline J. Oates, Alexandros Kapoulas
article en

Abstract

Abstract Scholars have called for the corporate social responsibility (CSR) discourse to be advanced by exploring CSR in different countries. Accordingly, this review presents cross‐national differences in CSR among four South‐East European (SEE) countries—Kosovo, Albania, Croatia and Greece. It addresses the state of the academic literature on CSR in SEE and probes what this literature reveals about the understanding and implementation of CSR in the region. An analysis of 45 CSR‐focused articles across these four SEE countries was undertaken using critical interpretive synthesis (CIS). The academic literature indicates that CSR research in SEE is at an embryonic stage. Similarly, CSR awareness in the region is lower than in other European countries. All four SEE countries demonstrate slow CSR adoption, but differences in implementation arise from their unique national contexts and levels of regional institutionalisation. This review emphasises the importance of a country's level of development for the application of CSR and highlights differences between developed (Greece and Croatia) and developing (Kosovo and Albania) countries. It proposes a typology of CSR practices across four actor levels—(1) company, (2) national, (3) regional and (4) international—and presents a conceptual framework illustrating institutional pressures at each level. Finally, it offers directions for future research to scholars interested in the region and provides guidance for SEE companies seeking to embrace CSR.

European Management Review
South East European Research Centre (GR), University of Sheffield (GB), University of Westminster (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Corporate Social Responsibility Reporting
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.