Optimal Safety Margins and Scoring System for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Crawling-Type Early Gastric Cancer

Background/Aims: Crawling-type adenocarcinoma (CTAC) is a subtype of gastric cancer characterized by lateral spreading, which makes margin assessment challenging. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors and characteristics of CTAC and provide guidance for achieving optimal resection margins during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data from 4,788 patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer between January 2012 and December 2023. The endoscopic and histopathological features of CTAC and the factors associated with lateral margin positivity (LMP) were identified. Results: Overall, 199 patients (4.2%) were classified as having CTAC. The CTAC group had a significantly higher LMP rate than the non-CTAC group (20.6% vs 4.2%; p<0.001). Risk factors for LMP in patients with CTAC were identified using logistic regression, and a scoring system was developed: 3 points, non-greater curvature side; 1 point, lesion long axis ≥20 mm; 2 points, expected minimum safety margin <5 mm; and 1 point, expected minimum safety margin 5-10 mm. Patients were categorized into low-risk (0-1 point, 2.6% LMP rate), moderate-risk (2-4 points, 18.8% LMP rate), and high-risk (5-6 points, 48.5% LMP rate) groups. Compared to the low-risk group, the moderate-risk group had an odds ratio of 8.538 (95% confidence interval, 1.116 to 65.355; p=0.039), and the high-risk group had an odds ratio of 34.824 (95% confidence interval, 4.263 to 284.466; p=0.001) for exhibiting LMP. Conclusions: Lesion size, location, and safety margins influenced the risk of LMP, emphasizing the importance of optimizing safety margins during ESD for CTAC.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Gut and Liver
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5009/gnl250484
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Optimal Safety Margins and Scoring System for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Crawling-Type Early Gastric Cancer

Jun Chul Park, Sang Kil Lee, Jin Won Chang, Ga Hee Kim et al.
Gut and Liver
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Optimal Safety Margins and Scoring System for Endoscopic Submucosal Dissection of Crawling-Type Early Gastric Cancer

Jun Chul Park, Sang Kil Lee, Jin Won Chang, Ga Hee Kim, Da Hyun Jung, Sung Kwan Shin, Yong Chan Lee, Eun Hwa Kim
article en

Abstract

Background/Aims: Crawling-type adenocarcinoma (CTAC) is a subtype of gastric cancer characterized by lateral spreading, which makes margin assessment challenging. We aimed to evaluate the risk factors and characteristics of CTAC and provide guidance for achieving optimal resection margins during endoscopic submucosal dissection (ESD). Methods: This retrospective study analyzed prospectively collected data from 4,788 patients who underwent ESD for early gastric cancer between January 2012 and December 2023. The endoscopic and histopathological features of CTAC and the factors associated with lateral margin positivity (LMP) were identified. Results: Overall, 199 patients (4.2%) were classified as having CTAC. The CTAC group had a significantly higher LMP rate than the non-CTAC group (20.6% vs 4.2%; p<0.001). Risk factors for LMP in patients with CTAC were identified using logistic regression, and a scoring system was developed: 3 points, non-greater curvature side; 1 point, lesion long axis ≥20 mm; 2 points, expected minimum safety margin <5 mm; and 1 point, expected minimum safety margin 5-10 mm. Patients were categorized into low-risk (0-1 point, 2.6% LMP rate), moderate-risk (2-4 points, 18.8% LMP rate), and high-risk (5-6 points, 48.5% LMP rate) groups. Compared to the low-risk group, the moderate-risk group had an odds ratio of 8.538 (95% confidence interval, 1.116 to 65.355; p=0.039), and the high-risk group had an odds ratio of 34.824 (95% confidence interval, 4.263 to 284.466; p=0.001) for exhibiting LMP. Conclusions: Lesion size, location, and safety margins influenced the risk of LMP, emphasizing the importance of optimizing safety margins during ESD for CTAC.

Gut and Liver
Yonsei University (KR), Yonsei University Health System (KR)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.