Short-term outcomes of a novel anti-reflux biologic flap technique versus double flap technique after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of proximal gastric cancer continues to rise. Proximal gastrectomy is effective in preserving a favorable postoperative nutritional status, but mitigating postoperative reflux esophagitis poses a formidable challenge. METHOD: We developed a novel anti-reflux procedure for laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) using a biologic patch to construct a mechanical anti-reflux barrier, termed the biologic flap technique (BFT). In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent LPG at our center between January 2020 and June 2024 were reviewed. Among them, 25 received BFT reconstruction and 54 underwent double flap technique (DFT) reconstruction. Short-term outcomes of the patients were compared to evaluate the clinical application value of BFT. RESULTS: Tumors were more frequently located at the esophagogastric junction and were larger in the LPG-BFT group than in the LPG-DFT group (60.0% vs. 27.8%, P = 0.006; median size 2.5 cm vs. 1.5 cm, P < 0.001). The median operation and anastomosis times were significantly shorter with LPG-BFT (170 min vs. 235 min and 28.0 min vs. 62.5 min, respectively; both P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in the rates of early and late postoperative complications between the groups, although anastomotic stenosis was less frequent in LPG-BFT (4.0% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.716). Multivariate analysis identified tumor location at the esophagogastric junction and the use of LPG-DFT as independent predictors of longer operation time. Los Angeles grade B or higher reflux esophagitis was observed in 8.7% of LPG-BFT patients and 7.5% of LPG-DFT patients (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: BFT following LPG is a safe and feasible procedure that can reduce operation time and may provide an alternative for anti-reflux reconstruction when DFT is technically challenging. Favorable short-term clinical outcomes support further evaluation of BFT as an alternative reconstruction technique.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Surgical Endoscopy
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00464-026-13465-2
Primary Topic
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Short-term outcomes of a novel anti-reflux biologic flap technique versus double flap technique after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Pengwei Zhao, Enmeng Li, Yanjun Sun, Guanglin Qiu et al.
Surgical Endoscopy
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
article

Short-term outcomes of a novel anti-reflux biologic flap technique versus double flap technique after laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy: a retrospective cohort study

Pengwei Zhao, Enmeng Li, Yanjun Sun, Guanglin Qiu, Xiangming Che, Lin Fan, Lindi Cai, Xuqi Li, Xinhua Liao, Gan Li, Yongtai Ma, Mengke Zhu, Junxiang Zhang
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The prevalence of proximal gastric cancer continues to rise. Proximal gastrectomy is effective in preserving a favorable postoperative nutritional status, but mitigating postoperative reflux esophagitis poses a formidable challenge. METHOD: We developed a novel anti-reflux procedure for laparoscopic proximal gastrectomy (LPG) using a biologic patch to construct a mechanical anti-reflux barrier, termed the biologic flap technique (BFT). In this retrospective cohort study, patients who underwent LPG at our center between January 2020 and June 2024 were reviewed. Among them, 25 received BFT reconstruction and 54 underwent double flap technique (DFT) reconstruction. Short-term outcomes of the patients were compared to evaluate the clinical application value of BFT. RESULTS: Tumors were more frequently located at the esophagogastric junction and were larger in the LPG-BFT group than in the LPG-DFT group (60.0% vs. 27.8%, P = 0.006; median size 2.5 cm vs. 1.5 cm, P < 0.001). The median operation and anastomosis times were significantly shorter with LPG-BFT (170 min vs. 235 min and 28.0 min vs. 62.5 min, respectively; both P < 0.001). No statistically significant differences were observed in the rates of early and late postoperative complications between the groups, although anastomotic stenosis was less frequent in LPG-BFT (4.0% vs. 9.3%, P = 0.716). Multivariate analysis identified tumor location at the esophagogastric junction and the use of LPG-DFT as independent predictors of longer operation time. Los Angeles grade B or higher reflux esophagitis was observed in 8.7% of LPG-BFT patients and 7.5% of LPG-DFT patients (P = 1.000). CONCLUSION: BFT following LPG is a safe and feasible procedure that can reduce operation time and may provide an alternative for anti-reflux reconstruction when DFT is technically challenging. Favorable short-term clinical outcomes support further evaluation of BFT as an alternative reconstruction technique.

Surgical Endoscopy
First Affiliated Hospital of Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN), Xi'an Jiaotong University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Gastric Cancer Management and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.