Standardization of Islamic fintech contracts: Legal pluralism, smart contract governance, and the common law challenge

The rapid expansion of Islamic fintech has introduced new possibilities for delivering Sharia-compliant financial services through digital platforms and blockchain-based smart contracts. However, this technological development also raises significant legal challenges concerning Sharia compliance, contractual enforceability, and cross-jurisdictional regulatory consistency. This article examines the legal issues surrounding the standardization of Islamic fintech contracts, focusing on both traditional Islamic financial contracts and their emerging smart contract equivalents. It argues that standardization in Islamic fintech is not merely a technical exercise aimed at improving efficiency and scalability, but a normative legal process that determines how Sharia principles are interpreted and operationalized within digital financial systems. Drawing on comparative insights from jurisdictions such as England, the United Arab Emirates, and Malaysia, the article demonstrates that common law and hybrid legal systems often prioritize contractual certainty and governing law clauses while struggling to accommodate Sharia as an independent normative framework. The article contends that meaningful standardization of Islamic fintech contracts requires a layered governance approach combining standardized contractual archetypes, Sharia supervisory oversight, technical auditability, and judicial review to ensure both legal enforceability and substantive Sharia compliance.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Common Law World Review
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/14737795261498920
Primary Topic
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Standardization of Islamic fintech contracts: Legal pluralism, smart contract governance, and the common law challenge

Ridoan Karim
Common Law World Review
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
article

Standardization of Islamic fintech contracts: Legal pluralism, smart contract governance, and the common law challenge

Ridoan Karim
article en

Abstract

The rapid expansion of Islamic fintech has introduced new possibilities for delivering Sharia-compliant financial services through digital platforms and blockchain-based smart contracts. However, this technological development also raises significant legal challenges concerning Sharia compliance, contractual enforceability, and cross-jurisdictional regulatory consistency. This article examines the legal issues surrounding the standardization of Islamic fintech contracts, focusing on both traditional Islamic financial contracts and their emerging smart contract equivalents. It argues that standardization in Islamic fintech is not merely a technical exercise aimed at improving efficiency and scalability, but a normative legal process that determines how Sharia principles are interpreted and operationalized within digital financial systems. Drawing on comparative insights from jurisdictions such as England, the United Arab Emirates, and Malaysia, the article demonstrates that common law and hybrid legal systems often prioritize contractual certainty and governing law clauses while struggling to accommodate Sharia as an independent normative framework. The article contends that meaningful standardization of Islamic fintech contracts requires a layered governance approach combining standardized contractual archetypes, Sharia supervisory oversight, technical auditability, and judicial review to ensure both legal enforceability and substantive Sharia compliance.

Common Law World Review
Monash University Malaysia (MY), Taylor's University (MY)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Islamic Finance and Banking Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.