Graft-to-Recipient weight ratio, graft inflow modulation, and small-for-size syndrome: A multicenter prospective study from the LDLT registry

Introduction: Graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) is widely used to guide graft selection in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), however its role as an independent predictor of postoperative outcomes and small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) remains debated. Graft inflow modulation (GIM) has been increasingly adopted to allow the safe use of smaller grafts. This study evaluated the impact of GRWR and GIM on short-term outcomes using data from a prospective international registry. Methods: An analysis of prospectively collected data from the International Living Donor Liver Transplant Registry (LDLTregistry.org) was conducted, including 1,944 consecutive LDLT performed at 55 centers (Sep 2023-Feb 2025). Recipients were stratified by GRWR (<0.60%, 0.60%-0.80%, >0.80%). Primary outcomes included major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3a), SFSS and 90-day mortality. Results: Lower GRWR was associated with higher rates of major complications, SFSS, and GIM use. Overall SFSS incidence, classified according to the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference Guidelines, was 36.9%, Grade B in 17.0%, and Grade C in 4.0%. SFSS of any grade increased progressively with lower GRWR: 33.4% in GRWR >0.80%, 43.7% in GRWR 0.60%-0.80%, and 63.1% in GRWR <0.60% ( p <0.001). Grade A SFSS was similar across groups ( p =0.12), whereas clinically significant SFSS (Grade B and C) was highest in the GRWR<0.6% (47.6%, p <0.001). 90-day mortality remained low (<5%) across all groups. Nearly half of small grafts were unexpectedly small, without worse short-term outcomes. On multivariable analysis, GRWR was not associated with major complications. Conclusions: GRWR influences short-term outcomes after LDLT but does not fully explain SFSS risk, which appears multifactorial. These findings support a shift away from graft size as the sole determinant of risk, toward a physiology-based, lobe-specific, and standardized intraoperative approach in LDLT.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Liver Transplantation
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1097/lvt.0000000000001022
Primary Topic
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Graft-to-Recipient weight ratio, graft inflow modulation, and small-for-size syndrome: A multicenter prospective study from the LDLT registry

Dieter Clemens Broering, Enrico Prosperi, Michael D. Spiro, Dimitri Aristotle Raptis et al.
Liver Transplantation
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
article

Graft-to-Recipient weight ratio, graft inflow modulation, and small-for-size syndrome: A multicenter prospective study from the LDLT registry

Dieter Clemens Broering, Enrico Prosperi, Michael D. Spiro, Dimitri Aristotle Raptis, Marina Berenguer, Mohamed Rela, The LDLTregistry.org Collaborative, Enrico Prosperi
article en

Abstract

Introduction: Graft-to-recipient weight ratio (GRWR) is widely used to guide graft selection in living donor liver transplantation (LDLT), however its role as an independent predictor of postoperative outcomes and small-for-size syndrome (SFSS) remains debated. Graft inflow modulation (GIM) has been increasingly adopted to allow the safe use of smaller grafts. This study evaluated the impact of GRWR and GIM on short-term outcomes using data from a prospective international registry. Methods: An analysis of prospectively collected data from the International Living Donor Liver Transplant Registry (LDLTregistry.org) was conducted, including 1,944 consecutive LDLT performed at 55 centers (Sep 2023-Feb 2025). Recipients were stratified by GRWR (<0.60%, 0.60%-0.80%, >0.80%). Primary outcomes included major postoperative complications (Clavien-Dindo ≥3a), SFSS and 90-day mortality. Results: Lower GRWR was associated with higher rates of major complications, SFSS, and GIM use. Overall SFSS incidence, classified according to the ILTS-iLDLT-LTSI Consensus Conference Guidelines, was 36.9%, Grade B in 17.0%, and Grade C in 4.0%. SFSS of any grade increased progressively with lower GRWR: 33.4% in GRWR >0.80%, 43.7% in GRWR 0.60%-0.80%, and 63.1% in GRWR <0.60% ( p <0.001). Grade A SFSS was similar across groups ( p =0.12), whereas clinically significant SFSS (Grade B and C) was highest in the GRWR<0.6% (47.6%, p <0.001). 90-day mortality remained low (<5%) across all groups. Nearly half of small grafts were unexpectedly small, without worse short-term outcomes. On multivariable analysis, GRWR was not associated with major complications. Conclusions: GRWR influences short-term outcomes after LDLT but does not fully explain SFSS risk, which appears multifactorial. These findings support a shift away from graft size as the sole determinant of risk, toward a physiology-based, lobe-specific, and standardized intraoperative approach in LDLT.

Liver Transplantation
Alfaisal University (SA), Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust (GB), King Faisal Specialist Hospital & Research Centre (SA), Hospital Universitari i Politècnic La Fe (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria La Fe (ES), University of Bologna (IT)
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Organ Transplantation Techniques and Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.