Venom Immunotherapy in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Real-World Cohort

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for Hymenoptera venom allergy, but real-world data describing VIT-related reactions and individualized premedication practices remain limited. We retrospectively evaluated 16 adults undergoing VIT with a target maintenance dose of 100 µg administered every 4 weeks at a tertiary allergy center between January 2024 and December 2025, focusing on clinical characteristics, premedication, treatment-related reactions, and field-sting outcomes during follow-up of up to 24 months. All patients had severe index reactions (Müller grade III-IV); 13 (81.3%) received Vespula VIT and 3 (18.8%) honey bee VIT. Premedication was initiated before VIT in seven patients (43.8%), including omalizumab in five (31.3%). During the 7-week up-dosing phase, five patients (31.3%) developed local reactions, whereas no systemic reactions occurred (0/16; 95% CI: 0–20.6%). During maintenance, one systemic reaction occurred (6.3%), requiring adrenaline and one-night intensive care admission, after which VIT was discontinued. Two patients were re-stung during follow-up and developed only local reactions. In this small, selected real-world cohort, no systemic reactions were observed during the up-dosing phase, whereas one systemic reaction occurred during maintenance. Given the limited sample size, wide confidence intervals, and frequent use of individualized premedication, these findings should be interpreted as descriptive observations and not as evidence establishing the safety of VIT or the effectiveness of premedication.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Toxins
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/toxins18100447
Primary Topic
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Venom Immunotherapy in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Real-World Cohort

Zeynep Yeğin Katran, Fatma Çakmak, İsmet Bulut, Mustafa Katran et al.
Toxins
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
article

Venom Immunotherapy in Clinical Practice: A Retrospective Real-World Cohort

Zeynep Yeğin Katran, Fatma Çakmak, İsmet Bulut, Mustafa Katran, Özge Argın
article en

Abstract

Venom immunotherapy (VIT) is the only disease-modifying treatment for Hymenoptera venom allergy, but real-world data describing VIT-related reactions and individualized premedication practices remain limited. We retrospectively evaluated 16 adults undergoing VIT with a target maintenance dose of 100 µg administered every 4 weeks at a tertiary allergy center between January 2024 and December 2025, focusing on clinical characteristics, premedication, treatment-related reactions, and field-sting outcomes during follow-up of up to 24 months. All patients had severe index reactions (Müller grade III-IV); 13 (81.3%) received Vespula VIT and 3 (18.8%) honey bee VIT. Premedication was initiated before VIT in seven patients (43.8%), including omalizumab in five (31.3%). During the 7-week up-dosing phase, five patients (31.3%) developed local reactions, whereas no systemic reactions occurred (0/16; 95% CI: 0–20.6%). During maintenance, one systemic reaction occurred (6.3%), requiring adrenaline and one-night intensive care admission, after which VIT was discontinued. Two patients were re-stung during follow-up and developed only local reactions. In this small, selected real-world cohort, no systemic reactions were observed during the up-dosing phase, whereas one systemic reaction occurred during maintenance. Given the limited sample size, wide confidence intervals, and frequent use of individualized premedication, these findings should be interpreted as descriptive observations and not as evidence establishing the safety of VIT or the effectiveness of premedication.

ToxinsVol. 18(10)
University of Health Science (KH), Sivas State Hospital (TR), Sağlık Bilimleri Üniversitesi (TR), Atlas Üniversitesi, University of Health Sciences Antigua (AG)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 15%
Food Allergy and Anaphylaxis Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.