Numerical Differences and Computational Performance Across Floating-Point Precision Configurations in a GPU-Accelerated 1D–2D Urban Flood Model

Coupled sewer–surface flood simulations are computationally demanding. We evaluated twelve surface-flow and exchange-discharge precision combinations in a graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated urban flood model for Jinju, Korea, using rain-on-grid (RoG) and rain-on-subcatchment (RoS) inputs. In 6 h hydraulic tests with 64-bit double-precision (FP64) exchange calculations, reduced-precision surface settings gave final water-depth root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.172–1.187 mm for RoG and 0.746–2.867 mm for RoS relative to the full-FP64 reference. Using 32-bit single precision (FP32) in selected exchange operations gave a maximum within-setting RMSE of 11.347 mm relative to FP64 exchange in the 48 h test. In a separate performance experiment, ten repeated 1 h runs per condition kept coupling data in GPU memory. Using FP32 for state storage and all targeted surface-flow operations, with FP64 exchange, achieved median speed-ups relative to the full-FP64 configuration of 1.883 (95% interval from repeated sampling: 1.876–1.887) for RoG and 1.205 (1.199–1.212) for RoS. The results identified this combination as an efficient candidate for the tested catchment. Local water-depth and exchange-volume differences should be assessed when applying it.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Water
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/w18202555
Primary Topic
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Numerical Differences and Computational Performance Across Floating-Point Precision Configurations in a GPU-Accelerated 1D–2D Urban Flood Model

Sang-Bo Sim, Hyung-Jun Kim
Water
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
article

Numerical Differences and Computational Performance Across Floating-Point Precision Configurations in a GPU-Accelerated 1D–2D Urban Flood Model

Sang-Bo Sim, Hyung-Jun Kim
article en

Abstract

Coupled sewer–surface flood simulations are computationally demanding. We evaluated twelve surface-flow and exchange-discharge precision combinations in a graphics processing unit (GPU)-accelerated urban flood model for Jinju, Korea, using rain-on-grid (RoG) and rain-on-subcatchment (RoS) inputs. In 6 h hydraulic tests with 64-bit double-precision (FP64) exchange calculations, reduced-precision surface settings gave final water-depth root mean square errors (RMSEs) of 0.172–1.187 mm for RoG and 0.746–2.867 mm for RoS relative to the full-FP64 reference. Using 32-bit single precision (FP32) in selected exchange operations gave a maximum within-setting RMSE of 11.347 mm relative to FP64 exchange in the 48 h test. In a separate performance experiment, ten repeated 1 h runs per condition kept coupling data in GPU memory. Using FP32 for state storage and all targeted surface-flow operations, with FP64 exchange, achieved median speed-ups relative to the full-FP64 configuration of 1.883 (95% interval from repeated sampling: 1.876–1.887) for RoG and 1.205 (1.199–1.212) for RoS. The results identified this combination as an efficient candidate for the tested catchment. Local water-depth and exchange-volume differences should be assessed when applying it.

WaterVol. 18(20)
Korea Institute of Civil Engineering and Building Technology (KR)
Ministry of Science and ICT, South Korea
Clean water and sanitation
Openalex Percentile: Top 21%
Urban Stormwater Management Solutions
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.