Automatic Data Dependence Analysis by Deductive Verification

Abstract Parallelization of programs is of essence in the high-performance computing (HPC) area. But parallelization is only correct if certain data dependences can be reliably excluded, for example, read-after-write dependences, where a read access occurs as the subsequent access on a data element after a write access. Data dependence analyses should not merely be correct, but as precise as possible, so as not to miss any opportunity for parallelization. Various dynamic and static analyses were proposed in the HPC community, but, until recently, none based on program logic and deductive verification, even though the latter approach has important advantages, including soundness, precision, and modularity. Previously a proof-of-concept was given that fully automatic dependence analysis based on deductive verification is possible, but it suffered from limitations that rendered it impractical: the restriction to one-dimensional arrays and flat loops and, importantly, it does not differentiate between inter- and intra-iteration data dependences, which often results in a loss of precision. In this paper we lift all three limitations and show that a deductive approach is a competitive alternative to the kinds of dependence analyses used hitherto in HPC. Our axiomatization in a deduction system constitutes the first formalization of the semantics of inter-iteration dependence.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Automated Reasoning
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s10817-026-09769-6
Primary Topic
Logic, programming, and type systems
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Automatic Data Dependence Analysis by Deductive Verification

Asmae Heydari Tabar, Richard Bubel, Reiner Hähnle
Journal of Automated Reasoning
Logic, programming, and type systems
article

Automatic Data Dependence Analysis by Deductive Verification

Asmae Heydari Tabar, Richard Bubel, Reiner Hähnle
article en

Abstract

Abstract Parallelization of programs is of essence in the high-performance computing (HPC) area. But parallelization is only correct if certain data dependences can be reliably excluded, for example, read-after-write dependences, where a read access occurs as the subsequent access on a data element after a write access. Data dependence analyses should not merely be correct, but as precise as possible, so as not to miss any opportunity for parallelization. Various dynamic and static analyses were proposed in the HPC community, but, until recently, none based on program logic and deductive verification, even though the latter approach has important advantages, including soundness, precision, and modularity. Previously a proof-of-concept was given that fully automatic dependence analysis based on deductive verification is possible, but it suffered from limitations that rendered it impractical: the restriction to one-dimensional arrays and flat loops and, importantly, it does not differentiate between inter- and intra-iteration data dependences, which often results in a loss of precision. In this paper we lift all three limitations and show that a deductive approach is a competitive alternative to the kinds of dependence analyses used hitherto in HPC. Our axiomatization in a deduction system constitutes the first formalization of the semantics of inter-iteration dependence.

Journal of Automated ReasoningVol. 70(2)
Karlsruhe Institute of Technology (DE), Darmstadt University of Applied Sciences (DE), Technische Universität Darmstadt (DE)
European High Performance Computing Joint Undertaking, European Commission, Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft, Bundesministerium für Bildung und Forschung
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Logic, programming, and type systems
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.