An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for 90-Day Mortality After Major Head and Neck Surgery

Introduction and aims Head and neck surgery carries substantial perioperative mortality, yet existing risk models lack head-and-neck specificity and interpretability. We aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning model for 90-day all-cause mortality after major head and neck surgery using LASSO, Boruta, and SHAP. Methods This study conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing major head and neck surgery between 2015 and 2020 in the INSPIRE database. LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm were applied for feature selection. Five classifiers—LASSO, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and AdaBoost—were trained and compared under repeated stratified 5-fold cross-validation. SHAP analysis of the Boruta–XGBoost model provided individualized interpretation of nonlinear prediction drivers. Results Among 15,694 patients, 90-day mortality was 0.44% (n = 69). At the natural outcome prevalence, LASSO showed the numerically highest discrimination (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.89), sensitivity (0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.88), and F1 score (0.028, 95% CI 0.025-0.032). The AUCs of CatBoost, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM were 0.81 (95% CI 0.75-0.87), 0.80 (95% CI 0.74-0.86), 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.84), and 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.84), respectively; however, the confidence intervals overlapped substantially. Within the Boruta–XGBoost model, SHAP analysis identified preoperative CRP (mean |SHAP| = 1.050), albumin (0.524), phosphate (0.419), sodium (0.419), lymphocyte count (0.348), ASA class (0.323), preoperative MACE within 30 days (0.317), platelet count (0.271), ALP (0.246), BUN (0.235), and troponin (0.154) as dominant predictors. Elevated inflammatory and metabolic markers and depleted nutritional and haematologic reserves shifted predictions toward higher mortality. Conclusions An interpretable machine learning framework integrating LASSO, Boruta, and SHAP identified parsimonious, biologically plausible predictors of 90-day mortality after head and neck surgery. Clinical significance SHAP-based individualized risk explanations translate algorithmic outputs into modifiable preoperative targets—inflammation, nutrition, electrolyte balance, and cardiovascular reserve—supporting personalized risk stratification, informed consent, and targeted prehabilitation in this high-risk surgical population.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Dental Journal
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.identj.2026.111235
Primary Topic
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for 90-Day Mortality After Major Head and Neck Surgery

Deborah Kreher, Linxin Jiang, Gerhard Schmalz, Daniel Ralph Reissmann et al.
International Dental Journal
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
article

An Interpretable Machine Learning Model for 90-Day Mortality After Major Head and Neck Surgery

Deborah Kreher, Linxin Jiang, Gerhard Schmalz, Daniel Ralph Reissmann, Simin Li, Liben Xie, Junlin Huang
article en

Abstract

Introduction and aims Head and neck surgery carries substantial perioperative mortality, yet existing risk models lack head-and-neck specificity and interpretability. We aimed to develop an interpretable machine learning model for 90-day all-cause mortality after major head and neck surgery using LASSO, Boruta, and SHAP. Methods This study conducted a retrospective cohort study of adult patients (≥18 years) undergoing major head and neck surgery between 2015 and 2020 in the INSPIRE database. LASSO regression and the Boruta algorithm were applied for feature selection. Five classifiers—LASSO, XGBoost, LightGBM, CatBoost, and AdaBoost—were trained and compared under repeated stratified 5-fold cross-validation. SHAP analysis of the Boruta–XGBoost model provided individualized interpretation of nonlinear prediction drivers. Results Among 15,694 patients, 90-day mortality was 0.44% (n = 69). At the natural outcome prevalence, LASSO showed the numerically highest discrimination (AUC 0.83, 95% CI 0.77-0.89), sensitivity (0.79, 95% CI 0.70-0.88), and F1 score (0.028, 95% CI 0.025-0.032). The AUCs of CatBoost, AdaBoost, XGBoost, and LightGBM were 0.81 (95% CI 0.75-0.87), 0.80 (95% CI 0.74-0.86), 0.78 (95% CI 0.72-0.84), and 0.77 (95% CI 0.70-0.84), respectively; however, the confidence intervals overlapped substantially. Within the Boruta–XGBoost model, SHAP analysis identified preoperative CRP (mean |SHAP| = 1.050), albumin (0.524), phosphate (0.419), sodium (0.419), lymphocyte count (0.348), ASA class (0.323), preoperative MACE within 30 days (0.317), platelet count (0.271), ALP (0.246), BUN (0.235), and troponin (0.154) as dominant predictors. Elevated inflammatory and metabolic markers and depleted nutritional and haematologic reserves shifted predictions toward higher mortality. Conclusions An interpretable machine learning framework integrating LASSO, Boruta, and SHAP identified parsimonious, biologically plausible predictors of 90-day mortality after head and neck surgery. Clinical significance SHAP-based individualized risk explanations translate algorithmic outputs into modifiable preoperative targets—inflammation, nutrition, electrolyte balance, and cardiovascular reserve—supporting personalized risk stratification, informed consent, and targeted prehabilitation in this high-risk surgical population.

International Dental JournalVol. 76(6)
Medizinische Hochschule Brandenburg Theodor Fontane (DE), Southern Medical University (CN), Leipzig University (DE)
Southern Medical University
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cardiac, Anesthesia and Surgical Outcomes
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.