The Concentration of Self-Injurious Behavior in Prisons: Institutional Hotspots and Serial Self Injury

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) poses persistent clinical and operational challenges in prisons. Yet, its institutional distribution remains under-examined. Using administrative records from a large state prison system, this study examines SIB concentration and seriality from FY 2019–2020 through FY 2023–2024. Across the period, 10,752 SIB events involved 4,828 individuals. In FY 2023–2024, 2,291 events involved 1,349 individuals, a rate of 30.1 per 1,000 inmates. The top 20 facilities accounted for 68.2% of events and 59.7% of involved individuals, demonstrating substantial institutional concentration. Rather than treating SIB as evenly distributed across prisons, agencies should consider using concentration and seriality metrics to identify institutional hotspots and prioritize targeted clinical and operational interventions.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
The Prison Journal
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1177/00328855261497701
Primary Topic
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

The Concentration of Self-Injurious Behavior in Prisons: Institutional Hotspots and Serial Self Injury

Suzonne M. Kline, Hayden P. Smith, Adam L. Wasserman
The Prison Journal
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
article

The Concentration of Self-Injurious Behavior in Prisons: Institutional Hotspots and Serial Self Injury

Suzonne M. Kline, Hayden P. Smith, Adam L. Wasserman
article en

Abstract

Self-injurious behavior (SIB) poses persistent clinical and operational challenges in prisons. Yet, its institutional distribution remains under-examined. Using administrative records from a large state prison system, this study examines SIB concentration and seriality from FY 2019–2020 through FY 2023–2024. Across the period, 10,752 SIB events involved 4,828 individuals. In FY 2023–2024, 2,291 events involved 1,349 individuals, a rate of 30.1 per 1,000 inmates. The top 20 facilities accounted for 68.2% of events and 59.7% of involved individuals, demonstrating substantial institutional concentration. Rather than treating SIB as evenly distributed across prisons, agencies should consider using concentration and seriality metrics to identify institutional hotspots and prioritize targeted clinical and operational interventions.

The Prison Journal
University of South Carolina (US), Florida Department of Corrections (US)
Good health and well-being, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Suicide and Self-Harm Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.