Advancing Disciplinary Independence and Academic Freedom in Social Work Research: Federal Funding in the Next 100 Years

This article analyzes the veritable explosion of funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the field of social work since the 1980s and contends with three pivotal moments in this history: the report of the National Institute of Mental Health’s (NIMH) Task Force on Social Work Research in 1991, the publication of the NIH Plan for Social Work Research in 2003, and the unprecedented overhaul of NIH funding in 2025. This article argues that although the acceleration of NIH funding has advanced research capacity and produced immeasurably valuable knowledge, it has also threatened to narrow the epistemological orientation of “the field,” thus limiting its scholarly autonomy and undermining its interdisciplinarity. Moreover, reliance on NIH funding has made us uniquely vulnerable to efforts to bring research into ideological alignment with the current presidential administration. This moment compels us to engage in long-overdue critical reflection on the future direction of our scholarship, to assert our independence collectively, and to recommit ourselves to our defining ethical principles. As we do so, we can chart a new course for social work scholarship grounded in renewed commitments to community partnerships, academic freedom, and the open pursuit of inquiry for the public good.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Social Service Review
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1086/743604
Primary Topic
Academic Freedom and Politics
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing Disciplinary Independence and Academic Freedom in Social Work Research: Federal Funding in the Next 100 Years

Kathryn R. Berringer
Social Service Review
Academic Freedom and Politics
article

Advancing Disciplinary Independence and Academic Freedom in Social Work Research: Federal Funding in the Next 100 Years

Kathryn R. Berringer
article en

Abstract

This article analyzes the veritable explosion of funding from the National Institutes of Health (NIH) in the field of social work since the 1980s and contends with three pivotal moments in this history: the report of the National Institute of Mental Health’s (NIMH) Task Force on Social Work Research in 1991, the publication of the NIH Plan for Social Work Research in 2003, and the unprecedented overhaul of NIH funding in 2025. This article argues that although the acceleration of NIH funding has advanced research capacity and produced immeasurably valuable knowledge, it has also threatened to narrow the epistemological orientation of “the field,” thus limiting its scholarly autonomy and undermining its interdisciplinarity. Moreover, reliance on NIH funding has made us uniquely vulnerable to efforts to bring research into ideological alignment with the current presidential administration. This moment compels us to engage in long-overdue critical reflection on the future direction of our scholarship, to assert our independence collectively, and to recommit ourselves to our defining ethical principles. As we do so, we can chart a new course for social work scholarship grounded in renewed commitments to community partnerships, academic freedom, and the open pursuit of inquiry for the public good.

Social Service Review
University of Kansas (US)
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
Academic Freedom and Politics
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.