Supporting Ethics of Care for Disinformation Management Through a Mixed Methods Investigation

As disinformation destabilizes the global information ecosystem, strategic communication professionals must increasingly assume responsibility for information integrity and ethical mitigation. This mixed-methods study investigates how organizational ethics of care influences employee involvement in disinformation mitigation. Grounded in social identity theory, the research employs a quantitative serial mediation analysis to identify the psychological drivers of ethical action, revealing that organizational ethics of care initiates a chain reaction in which ethical culture fosters organizational identification and affective investment, which together provide the psychological fuel for practitioners to become active stewards of truth. Qualitative thematic analysis of professional accounts yielded four core themes: cognitive pause, identity gate, digital triage, and relational stewardship. These themes collectively illustrate how macro-level organizational ethics of care are experienced and enacted as individual communicative behavior. Integrated, the findings suggest that ethical organizational cultures in which strategic communication professionals feel invested, and with which they identify, play an important role in disinformation counterpractices. This research offers a relational lens for ethical decision-making and practical metrics for institutional readiness within the industry.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Strategic Communication
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/1553118x.2026.2742338
Primary Topic
Ethics in Business and Education
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Supporting Ethics of Care for Disinformation Management Through a Mixed Methods Investigation

Courtney D. Boman, Laura L. Lemon, LaTonya J. Taylor
International Journal of Strategic Communication
Ethics in Business and Education
article

Supporting Ethics of Care for Disinformation Management Through a Mixed Methods Investigation

Courtney D. Boman, Laura L. Lemon, LaTonya J. Taylor
article en

Abstract

As disinformation destabilizes the global information ecosystem, strategic communication professionals must increasingly assume responsibility for information integrity and ethical mitigation. This mixed-methods study investigates how organizational ethics of care influences employee involvement in disinformation mitigation. Grounded in social identity theory, the research employs a quantitative serial mediation analysis to identify the psychological drivers of ethical action, revealing that organizational ethics of care initiates a chain reaction in which ethical culture fosters organizational identification and affective investment, which together provide the psychological fuel for practitioners to become active stewards of truth. Qualitative thematic analysis of professional accounts yielded four core themes: cognitive pause, identity gate, digital triage, and relational stewardship. These themes collectively illustrate how macro-level organizational ethics of care are experienced and enacted as individual communicative behavior. Integrated, the findings suggest that ethical organizational cultures in which strategic communication professionals feel invested, and with which they identify, play an important role in disinformation counterpractices. This research offers a relational lens for ethical decision-making and practical metrics for institutional readiness within the industry.

International Journal of Strategic Communication
University of Alabama (US)
Arthur W. Page Center for Integrity in Public Communication
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 7%
Ethics in Business and Education
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.