Proactive, open, platform-based and data-driven: Assessing the institutional foundations for AI in EU public administration

IMPACTThis article speaks to senior civil servants, digital government strategists and EU policy-makers who allocate AI and digital transformation funding, particularly those managing recovery and resilience facility investments and national digital government strategies. It offers a practical diagnostic tool, the AI Foundations Index (AFI), which identifies which specific institutional foundation—anticipatory capacity, open data practices, platform infrastructure, or data-driven decision-making—is weakest in a given country, rather than relying on aggregate digital rankings that can mask critical gaps. The findings show that even digitally advanced states, such as the Netherlands, may lack the institutional scaffolding needed to deploy AI responsibly. Moreover, the nearly 15-to-1 disparity in anticipatory capacity across the EU suggests that funding AI pilots before strengthening these foundations risks reproducing the institutional failures exemplified by the Dutch childcare benefits scandal. Practitioners can use the index to sequence investment so that foundation building precedes, rather than follows, AI-specific initiatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Public Money & Management
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09540962.2026.2744327
Primary Topic
E-Government and Public Services
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Proactive, open, platform-based and data-driven: Assessing the institutional foundations for AI in EU public administration

Sorin Burlacu
Public Money & Management
E-Government and Public Services
article

Proactive, open, platform-based and data-driven: Assessing the institutional foundations for AI in EU public administration

Sorin Burlacu
article en

Abstract

IMPACTThis article speaks to senior civil servants, digital government strategists and EU policy-makers who allocate AI and digital transformation funding, particularly those managing recovery and resilience facility investments and national digital government strategies. It offers a practical diagnostic tool, the AI Foundations Index (AFI), which identifies which specific institutional foundation—anticipatory capacity, open data practices, platform infrastructure, or data-driven decision-making—is weakest in a given country, rather than relying on aggregate digital rankings that can mask critical gaps. The findings show that even digitally advanced states, such as the Netherlands, may lack the institutional scaffolding needed to deploy AI responsibly. Moreover, the nearly 15-to-1 disparity in anticipatory capacity across the EU suggests that funding AI pilots before strengthening these foundations risks reproducing the institutional failures exemplified by the Dutch childcare benefits scandal. Practitioners can use the index to sequence investment so that foundation building precedes, rather than follows, AI-specific initiatives.

Public Money & Management
Bucharest University of Economic Studies (RO)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions, Industry, innovation and infrastructure
Openalex Percentile: Top 4%
E-Government and Public Services
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.