Clinical Impact of Physiology-Guided PCI: 1-year Results of the Post-Revascularization Optimization and Physiological Evaluation of Intermediate Lesions using Fractional Flow Reserve (PROPHET-FFR) Study
Background: The clinical value of physiological assessment after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) remains uncertain. We evaluated clinical outcomes associated with post-PCI physiology and temporal trends in its adoption. Methods: PROPHET-FFR (NCT05056662) is an ambispective observational study of patients undergoing invasive physiological assessment of intermediate coronary stenoses. Patients were categorized into three strategies: deferred revascularization based on non-ischemic physiology (deferred PCI), PCI for ischemic lesions without post-PCI physiological assessment (conventional PCI), and physiology-guided PCI with post-PCI assessment and optimization when indicated (post-PCI physiology). Temporal trends in the use of post-PCI physiology and physiology-guided optimization were evaluated, together with the incidence of 12-month major adverse cardiovascular events (MACE), comprising cardiovascular death, spontaneous myocardial infarction, and target-vessel revascularization (TVR). Propensity score matching between conventional PCI and post-PCI physiology was performed to confirm the primary findings. Results: Among 1,986 patients, 1,307 underwent deferred PCI, 331 conventional PCI, and 348 post-PCI physiology. At 12 months, MACE occurred in 4.1%, 7.6%, and 3.4%, respectively (p=0.011). Compared with conventional-PCI, post-PCI physiology had lower MACE (3.4% vs 7.6%; p=0.019), primarily driven by reduced TVR (2.6% vs 5.4%; p=0.057), with consistent findings after propensity score matching (226 patients/group; 2.7% vs 8.0%; p=0.0114). Post-PCI physiology increased from 11.8% to 22.8% across registry phases (p<0.001), with a numerical increase in physiology-guided optimization (11.6% vs 18.1%; p=0.08). Conclusions: In this observational study, post-PCI physiology appears to be associated with lower 12-month MACE compared with conventional PCI, with consistent findings after propensity score matching.
Authors
- Mattia Lunardi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8344-6048)
- Chiara Giuliana (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0003-2451-0531)
- Francesco Fracassi (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8099-1224)
- Simona Todisco (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7837-7412)
- Antonino Buffon (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8144-6597)
- Leonardo Calò (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6062-5286)
- Lazzaro Paraggio (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7358-8050)
- Simone Biscaglia (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6074-2370)
- Giuseppe Zimbardo
- Pio Cialdella (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0850-2323)
- Antonio Maria Leone (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1276-9883)
- Stefano Migliaro
- Gianluca Calogero Campo (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5150-188X)
- Enrico Romagnoli (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1611-7708)
- Carlo Trani (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9777-013X)
- Cristina Aurigemma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6391-422X)
- Ciro Pollio Benvenuto (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0006-3243-4235)
- Vincenzo Viccaro (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0009-0009-1156-6572)
- Francesco Burzotta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6569-9401)
- Domenico Galante (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8663-3225)
- Andrea Vicerè (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5627-3329)
Institutions
- Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT)
- Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT)
- Aurelia Hospital (IT)
- Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale (CH)
- St. Antonius Ziekenhuis (NL)
- Arcispedale Sant'Anna (IT)
- European Hospital (IT)
- Policlinico Casilino (IT)
- Istituti di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IT)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Circulation Cardiovascular Interventions
- Published
- 2026-10-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1161/circinterventions.126.017446
- Primary Topic
- Coronary Interventions and Diagnostics
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00