Advancing mechanistic sepsis research using remnant patient specimens

Sepsis is the third leading cause of death among hospitalized patients in the United States and remains a major global health burden. Mechanistic sepsis research is constrained by the expense and complexity of prospective biospecimen collection. Utilizing clinical diagnostic remnant specimens offers a cost-effective and scalable alternative to increase biospecimen availability and diversity. This study evaluated the volume, integrity, hemolysis, and biomarker concentrations of remnant blood specimens compared with prospectively collected research samples. A prospective cohort study was conducted among adults meeting Sepsis-3 criteria within six hours of emergency department admission at UPMC Presbyterian Hospital (October 2022–December 2023). Remnant plasma specimens were obtained from the hospital laboratory after clinical testing and compared with matched research samples for plasma volume, number of aliquots, hemolysis, and biomarker concentrations. Among 64 enrolled participants, remnant specimens provided adequate plasma volume (median 1.10 mL heparin, 0.80 mL EDTA) but yielded fewer aliquots than research specimens. No remnant samples demonstrated hemolysis after an average of 40 h at 4 °C, indicating preserved specimen integrity suitable for downstream analyses. Angiopoietin-2 and E-selectin concentrations were not significantly different between research and remnant samples (both with p = 1.0) with strong correlation (rho 0.95 and 0.78, respectively). Remnant biospecimens maintain sufficient quality and volume for mechanistic sepsis research, supporting their feasibility as a low-cost, scalable alternative to traditional specimen collection.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Research Notes
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s13104-026-07978-1
Primary Topic
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Advancing mechanistic sepsis research using remnant patient specimens

Octavia M. Peck Palmer, Christopher W. Seymour, Derek Angus, Kelly Urbanek et al.
BMC Research Notes
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Advancing mechanistic sepsis research using remnant patient specimens

Octavia M. Peck Palmer, Christopher W. Seymour, Derek Angus, Kelly Urbanek, Emma J. Baumgartner, Jason N. Kennedy, Christopher Horvat, Michael W. Muir, Lu Tang
article en

Abstract

Sepsis is the third leading cause of death among hospitalized patients in the United States and remains a major global health burden. Mechanistic sepsis research is constrained by the expense and complexity of prospective biospecimen collection. Utilizing clinical diagnostic remnant specimens offers a cost-effective and scalable alternative to increase biospecimen availability and diversity. This study evaluated the volume, integrity, hemolysis, and biomarker concentrations of remnant blood specimens compared with prospectively collected research samples. A prospective cohort study was conducted among adults meeting Sepsis-3 criteria within six hours of emergency department admission at UPMC Presbyterian Hospital (October 2022–December 2023). Remnant plasma specimens were obtained from the hospital laboratory after clinical testing and compared with matched research samples for plasma volume, number of aliquots, hemolysis, and biomarker concentrations. Among 64 enrolled participants, remnant specimens provided adequate plasma volume (median 1.10 mL heparin, 0.80 mL EDTA) but yielded fewer aliquots than research specimens. No remnant samples demonstrated hemolysis after an average of 40 h at 4 °C, indicating preserved specimen integrity suitable for downstream analyses. Angiopoietin-2 and E-selectin concentrations were not significantly different between research and remnant samples (both with p = 1.0) with strong correlation (rho 0.95 and 0.78, respectively). Remnant biospecimens maintain sufficient quality and volume for mechanistic sepsis research, supporting their feasibility as a low-cost, scalable alternative to traditional specimen collection.

BMC Research Notes
University of Pittsburgh (US)
National Institute of General Medical Sciences
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Sepsis Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.