Examining affective flexibility using self-organized task switching: insights into self-initiated cognitive-emotional control

Affective flexibility, the ability to adapt cognitive control in emotional contexts, is essential, yet how emotional information shapes voluntary decisions to persist with or change a task remains unclear. We introduce an affective voluntary task-switching paradigm that dissociates emotion's influence on voluntary task decisions (repeat or switch) from its effects on task performance. Fifty participants viewed facial stimuli and freely chose which task to perform; repetitions were delayed by an increasing interval to encourage switching. In Experiment 1, emotion was relevant to one task (emotion versus gender); in Experiment 2, it was irrelevant to both (age versus gender). Across experiments, reliable switch costs emerged and correlated with switch rates, indicating task decisions tracked performance costs rather than random selection. Emotional content affected decisions and performance differently by relevance. When emotion was relevant, emotional content did not predict the task decision, with Bayesian evidence favouring its absence, whereas performance was modulated. When emotion was irrelevant, emotional distractors increased subsequent switching and impaired performance, consistent with task-irrelevant emotion competing for the resources sustaining the task. These findings show that emotional information shapes voluntary control through partly separable effects on task selection and performance, establishing the paradigm for studying affective flexibility.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cognition & Emotion
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/02699931.2026.2745072
Primary Topic
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Examining affective flexibility using self-organized task switching: insights into self-initiated cognitive-emotional control

Sharon Naparstek, Lihi Cohen, Irina Monno, Andrea Kiesel et al.
Cognition & Emotion
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
article

Examining affective flexibility using self-organized task switching: insights into self-initiated cognitive-emotional control

Sharon Naparstek, Lihi Cohen, Irina Monno, Andrea Kiesel, Rotem Menachem
article en

Abstract

Affective flexibility, the ability to adapt cognitive control in emotional contexts, is essential, yet how emotional information shapes voluntary decisions to persist with or change a task remains unclear. We introduce an affective voluntary task-switching paradigm that dissociates emotion's influence on voluntary task decisions (repeat or switch) from its effects on task performance. Fifty participants viewed facial stimuli and freely chose which task to perform; repetitions were delayed by an increasing interval to encourage switching. In Experiment 1, emotion was relevant to one task (emotion versus gender); in Experiment 2, it was irrelevant to both (age versus gender). Across experiments, reliable switch costs emerged and correlated with switch rates, indicating task decisions tracked performance costs rather than random selection. Emotional content affected decisions and performance differently by relevance. When emotion was relevant, emotional content did not predict the task decision, with Bayesian evidence favouring its absence, whereas performance was modulated. When emotion was irrelevant, emotional distractors increased subsequent switching and impaired performance, consistent with task-irrelevant emotion competing for the resources sustaining the task. These findings show that emotional information shapes voluntary control through partly separable effects on task selection and performance, establishing the paradigm for studying affective flexibility.

Cognition & Emotion
Bar-Ilan University (IL), University of Freiburg (DE)
Openalex Percentile: Top 14%
Neural and Behavioral Psychology Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.