Asian american parenting profiles and child psychopathology: a cross-sectional latent profile analysis

Asian American (AA) parenting remains understudied and is often mischaracterized due to overgeneralizations. Given the diversity across AA subgroups, there is a critical need to better understand the range of parenting practices within these families and how they relate to child mental health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to empirically identify distinct AA parenting profiles and examine profile associations with parent-reported child psychopathology, including potential differences by parent sex and child age. Participants were AA parents recruited from Qualtrics panels in the United States ( N = 376; M parent age = 40.16). Our sample consisted of 63.6% mothers ( n = 239) and 36.4% fathers ( n = 137), with at least one child aged 3–17 ( M child age = 9.88). Latent profile analysis (LPA) was performed to characterize distinct AA parenting profiles. Linear regressions examined the associations between the parenting profiles and parent-reported child psychopathology, adjusting for covariates. Parent sex and child age were investigated as moderators in the association between parenting profiles and parent-reported child psychopathology. Three profiles emerged within our sample: (1) High Positive/Low Negative Parenting ( n = 209; 55.6%), (2) Intermediate Parenting ( n = 125; 33.2%), (3) Very Low Positive/Elevated Negative Parenting ( n = 42; 11.2%). Regression analyses explained a significant portion of variance in all six parent-reported child psychopathology scores ( R 2 s = 16.2%-28.4%; p s < 0.001). Children with parents in Intermediate Parenting and Very Low Positive/Elevated Negative Parenting had significantly higher scores on all parent-reported psychopathology scales compared to those in High Positive/Low Negative Parenting ( p s ≤ 0.01). Parent sex and child age did not significantly moderate these associations, suggesting that the association between parenting profiles and parent-reported child psychopathology may be relatively consistent across these demographic groups. This study highlights heterogeneity in parent-reported positive and negative parenting among AA parents within this sample. Parenting profiles characterized by relatively lower positive and higher negative parenting were associated with greater parent-reported child difficulties. Findings underscore the importance of avoiding assumptions of uniformity in AA parenting.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Psychology
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s40359-026-05755-0
Primary Topic
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Asian american parenting profiles and child psychopathology: a cross-sectional latent profile analysis

Violeta J. Rodriguez, Ashley Benhayoun, Antonia Yuxin Hua, Jessica Chen
BMC Psychology
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
article

Asian american parenting profiles and child psychopathology: a cross-sectional latent profile analysis

Violeta J. Rodriguez, Ashley Benhayoun, Antonia Yuxin Hua, Jessica Chen
article en

Abstract

Asian American (AA) parenting remains understudied and is often mischaracterized due to overgeneralizations. Given the diversity across AA subgroups, there is a critical need to better understand the range of parenting practices within these families and how they relate to child mental health outcomes. The purpose of this study was to empirically identify distinct AA parenting profiles and examine profile associations with parent-reported child psychopathology, including potential differences by parent sex and child age. Participants were AA parents recruited from Qualtrics panels in the United States ( N = 376; M parent age = 40.16). Our sample consisted of 63.6% mothers ( n = 239) and 36.4% fathers ( n = 137), with at least one child aged 3–17 ( M child age = 9.88). Latent profile analysis (LPA) was performed to characterize distinct AA parenting profiles. Linear regressions examined the associations between the parenting profiles and parent-reported child psychopathology, adjusting for covariates. Parent sex and child age were investigated as moderators in the association between parenting profiles and parent-reported child psychopathology. Three profiles emerged within our sample: (1) High Positive/Low Negative Parenting ( n = 209; 55.6%), (2) Intermediate Parenting ( n = 125; 33.2%), (3) Very Low Positive/Elevated Negative Parenting ( n = 42; 11.2%). Regression analyses explained a significant portion of variance in all six parent-reported child psychopathology scores ( R 2 s = 16.2%-28.4%; p s < 0.001). Children with parents in Intermediate Parenting and Very Low Positive/Elevated Negative Parenting had significantly higher scores on all parent-reported psychopathology scales compared to those in High Positive/Low Negative Parenting ( p s ≤ 0.01). Parent sex and child age did not significantly moderate these associations, suggesting that the association between parenting profiles and parent-reported child psychopathology may be relatively consistent across these demographic groups. This study highlights heterogeneity in parent-reported positive and negative parenting among AA parents within this sample. Parenting profiles characterized by relatively lower positive and higher negative parenting were associated with greater parent-reported child difficulties. Findings underscore the importance of avoiding assumptions of uniformity in AA parenting.

BMC Psychology
University of Illinois Urbana-Champaign (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.