Analysis of the relative uncertainty in asphalt pavement rutting prediction in China based on CMIP6 models

Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions exacerbate global warming, threatening asphalt pavement performance due to its strong temperature sensitivity. Most existing studies adopt only one global climate model (GCM), ignoring inter-model uncertainties when evaluating pavement performance. This study uses six CMIP6 models to explore how inter-model temperature discrepancies affect asphalt rutting predictions across China under three SSP scenarios. Near-surface air temperature projections are converted into asphalt mixture equivalent temperatures and incorporated into a rutting prediction model. The study compares temperature and equivalent-temperature biases, as well as rutting results at national, spatial and city scales, and quantifies relative uncertainty via the generalized three-cornered hat (GTCH) method. Results show obvious inter-model differences in temperature projections, and absolute uncertainty increases after equivalent-temperature conversion. Under SSP5-8.5 (2051–2060), rutting predictions vary by as much as 4.1 mm. Model selection may affect whether predicted rutting exceeds the 15 mm expressway maintenance threshold in certain cities. CanESM5 exhibits the highest rutting relative uncertainty among the six models, while the other models show lower or intermediate levels with varying responses across scenarios. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for inter-model variability in climate-informed pavement performance assessment and maintenance planning.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Pavement Engineering
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/10298436.2026.2748445
Primary Topic
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Analysis of the relative uncertainty in asphalt pavement rutting prediction in China based on CMIP6 models

Shu Yang, Yang Yang
International Journal of Pavement Engineering
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
article

Analysis of the relative uncertainty in asphalt pavement rutting prediction in China based on CMIP6 models

Shu Yang, Yang Yang
article en

Abstract

Anthropogenic greenhouse gas emissions exacerbate global warming, threatening asphalt pavement performance due to its strong temperature sensitivity. Most existing studies adopt only one global climate model (GCM), ignoring inter-model uncertainties when evaluating pavement performance. This study uses six CMIP6 models to explore how inter-model temperature discrepancies affect asphalt rutting predictions across China under three SSP scenarios. Near-surface air temperature projections are converted into asphalt mixture equivalent temperatures and incorporated into a rutting prediction model. The study compares temperature and equivalent-temperature biases, as well as rutting results at national, spatial and city scales, and quantifies relative uncertainty via the generalized three-cornered hat (GTCH) method. Results show obvious inter-model differences in temperature projections, and absolute uncertainty increases after equivalent-temperature conversion. Under SSP5-8.5 (2051–2060), rutting predictions vary by as much as 4.1 mm. Model selection may affect whether predicted rutting exceeds the 15 mm expressway maintenance threshold in certain cities. CanESM5 exhibits the highest rutting relative uncertainty among the six models, while the other models show lower or intermediate levels with varying responses across scenarios. These findings highlight the importance of accounting for inter-model variability in climate-informed pavement performance assessment and maintenance planning.

International Journal of Pavement EngineeringVol. 27(1)
Hunan University (CN)
Climate action, Sustainable cities and communities
Openalex Percentile: Top 18%
Asphalt Pavement Performance Evaluation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.