Responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes by disease trajectory in systemic lupus erythematosus

OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with persistent symptoms that profoundly impair quality of life yet are often under-recognized by clinician-assessed instruments. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly incorporated in clinical trials to capture treatment benefit from the patient perspective. However, the responsiveness of PRO instruments and their alignment with clinician-assessed disease activity across distinct SLE trajectories remain incompletely defined. We evaluated the longitudinal responsiveness and convergent validity of PRO measures across predefined disease trajectory classes. METHODS: Secondary analysis of pooled patient-level data from two phase III randomized clinical trials of belimumab in adults with active SLE (n = 1908), stratified into four previously derived trajectory classes defined by baseline disease activity and treatment response. PROs included FACIT-Fatigue, SF-36 PCS and MCS, EQ-5D-3L, and EQ-VAS. Responsiveness was quantified using standardized response means (SRMs). Convergent validity was evaluated using repeated-measures correlations between within-person changes in PROs and clinician-assessed disease activity measures (SLEDAI-2K, BILAG, and PGA), with sensitivity analyses performed to assess the robustness of findings. RESULTS: FACIT-F and SF-36 PCS generally demonstrated the greatest responsiveness, while EQ-5D-3L showed smaller changes and less consistent responsiveness across classes and timepoints. FACIT-F demonstrated early responsiveness, whereas SF-36 PCS showed sustained responsiveness over later follow-up. PRO changes were most consistently associated with PGA. Sensitivity analyses showed broadly similar patterns. CONCLUSION: FACIT-F and SF-36 PCS demonstrated the greatest responsiveness and alignment with clinician-assessed disease activity. EQ-5D-3L showed less consistent responsiveness, suggesting domain-specific PROs may better capture treatment benefit in SLE trials and health technology assessments.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Lara D. Veeken
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag576
Primary Topic
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes by disease trajectory in systemic lupus erythematosus

Zahi Touma, Elena Netchiporouk, John S. Barbieri, Julian Cappelli et al.
Lara D. Veeken
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
article

Responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes by disease trajectory in systemic lupus erythematosus

Zahi Touma, Elena Netchiporouk, John S. Barbieri, Julian Cappelli, Anastasiya Muntyanu, Mohammed Kaouache, Stephanie R. Goldberg, Lorenzo Beretta, Ioannis Parodis, Sabrina Hundal, Jessica Muha, Savanah Haidar
article en

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with persistent symptoms that profoundly impair quality of life yet are often under-recognized by clinician-assessed instruments. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly incorporated in clinical trials to capture treatment benefit from the patient perspective. However, the responsiveness of PRO instruments and their alignment with clinician-assessed disease activity across distinct SLE trajectories remain incompletely defined. We evaluated the longitudinal responsiveness and convergent validity of PRO measures across predefined disease trajectory classes. METHODS: Secondary analysis of pooled patient-level data from two phase III randomized clinical trials of belimumab in adults with active SLE (n = 1908), stratified into four previously derived trajectory classes defined by baseline disease activity and treatment response. PROs included FACIT-Fatigue, SF-36 PCS and MCS, EQ-5D-3L, and EQ-VAS. Responsiveness was quantified using standardized response means (SRMs). Convergent validity was evaluated using repeated-measures correlations between within-person changes in PROs and clinician-assessed disease activity measures (SLEDAI-2K, BILAG, and PGA), with sensitivity analyses performed to assess the robustness of findings. RESULTS: FACIT-F and SF-36 PCS generally demonstrated the greatest responsiveness, while EQ-5D-3L showed smaller changes and less consistent responsiveness across classes and timepoints. FACIT-F demonstrated early responsiveness, whereas SF-36 PCS showed sustained responsiveness over later follow-up. PRO changes were most consistently associated with PGA. Sensitivity analyses showed broadly similar patterns. CONCLUSION: FACIT-F and SF-36 PCS demonstrated the greatest responsiveness and alignment with clinician-assessed disease activity. EQ-5D-3L showed less consistent responsiveness, suggesting domain-specific PROs may better capture treatment benefit in SLE trials and health technology assessments.

Lara D. Veeken
University Health Network (CA), Karolinska University Hospital (SE), Prince Sultan University (SA), University of Calgary (CA), University of Toronto (CA), University of Mary Washington (US), Örebro University (SE), Toronto Western Hospital (CA), McGill University Health Centre (CA), Mary Washington Hospital (US), Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT), Karolinska Institutet (SE), Ospedale Maggiore (IT), Arthritis Society (CA), Institute for Rheumatic Diseases (Japan) (JP), Krembil Foundation (CA), Krembil Research Institute, Université de Montréal (CA), Hamilton Health Sciences (CA), University of Pennsylvania (US), McMaster University (CA)
Amgen, Eli Lilly and Company, Gilead Sciences, Reumatikerförbundet, Sanofi Pasteur
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.