Responsiveness of patient-reported outcomes by disease trajectory in systemic lupus erythematosus
OBJECTIVES: Systemic lupus erythematosus (SLE) is a heterogeneous autoimmune disease with persistent symptoms that profoundly impair quality of life yet are often under-recognized by clinician-assessed instruments. Patient-reported outcomes (PROs) are increasingly incorporated in clinical trials to capture treatment benefit from the patient perspective. However, the responsiveness of PRO instruments and their alignment with clinician-assessed disease activity across distinct SLE trajectories remain incompletely defined. We evaluated the longitudinal responsiveness and convergent validity of PRO measures across predefined disease trajectory classes. METHODS: Secondary analysis of pooled patient-level data from two phase III randomized clinical trials of belimumab in adults with active SLE (n = 1908), stratified into four previously derived trajectory classes defined by baseline disease activity and treatment response. PROs included FACIT-Fatigue, SF-36 PCS and MCS, EQ-5D-3L, and EQ-VAS. Responsiveness was quantified using standardized response means (SRMs). Convergent validity was evaluated using repeated-measures correlations between within-person changes in PROs and clinician-assessed disease activity measures (SLEDAI-2K, BILAG, and PGA), with sensitivity analyses performed to assess the robustness of findings. RESULTS: FACIT-F and SF-36 PCS generally demonstrated the greatest responsiveness, while EQ-5D-3L showed smaller changes and less consistent responsiveness across classes and timepoints. FACIT-F demonstrated early responsiveness, whereas SF-36 PCS showed sustained responsiveness over later follow-up. PRO changes were most consistently associated with PGA. Sensitivity analyses showed broadly similar patterns. CONCLUSION: FACIT-F and SF-36 PCS demonstrated the greatest responsiveness and alignment with clinician-assessed disease activity. EQ-5D-3L showed less consistent responsiveness, suggesting domain-specific PROs may better capture treatment benefit in SLE trials and health technology assessments.
Authors
- Zahi Touma (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5177-2076)
- Elena Netchiporouk (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6692-7787)
- John S. Barbieri (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5467-4102)
- Julian Cappelli
- Anastasiya Muntyanu (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9776-866X)
- Mohammed Kaouache (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0876-047X)
- Stephanie R. Goldberg (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9895-3798)
- Lorenzo Beretta (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6529-6258)
- Ioannis Parodis (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-4875-5395)
- Sabrina Hundal (ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8855-4491)
- Jessica Muha
- Savanah Haidar
Institutions
- University Health Network (CA)
- Karolinska University Hospital (SE)
- Prince Sultan University (SA)
- University of Calgary (CA)
- University of Toronto (CA)
- University of Mary Washington (US)
- Örebro University (SE)
- Toronto Western Hospital (CA)
- McGill University Health Centre (CA)
- Mary Washington Hospital (US)
- Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico (IT)
- Karolinska Institutet (SE)
- Ospedale Maggiore (IT)
- Arthritis Society (CA)
- Institute for Rheumatic Diseases (Japan) (JP)
- Krembil Foundation (CA)
- Krembil Research Institute
- Université de Montréal (CA)
- Hamilton Health Sciences (CA)
- University of Pennsylvania (US)
- McMaster University (CA)
Publication Details
- Journal
- Lara D. Veeken
- Published
- 2026-10-15
- DOI
- https://doi.org/10.1093/rheumatology/keag576
- Primary Topic
- Systemic Lupus Erythematosus Research
- Type
- article
- Field-Weighted Citation Impact
- 0.00
Funders
- Amgen
- Eli Lilly and Company
- Gilead Sciences
- Reumatikerförbundet
- Sanofi Pasteur