Pulse vs. R-R Interval: Validity and Reliability of the Garmin Elevate v4 Sensor for Ultra-Short HR and HRV Monitoring in Healthy Adults

Accurate resting heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring is crucial for evaluating autonomic nervous system balance and guiding training. This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Garmin Forerunner 955 smartwatch (Elevate v4 sensor) against an electrocardiogram (ECG) reference for measuring resting HR and photoplethysmography (PPG)-derived pulse rate variability (PRV), evaluated through the root mean square of successive differences (rMSSDPRV), compared to reference ECG-derived HRV (rMSSDHRV). Twenty-three healthy adults underwent simultaneous assessments using the smartwatch and a Biopac ECG during short recordings in supine and seated positions under controlled breathing. For resting HR, the optical device demonstrated a near-perfect linear association (r ≥ 0.94) and substantial concordance with the ECG. While rMSSDPRV demonstrated good-to-excellent intrasession test–retest reliability, its agreement with ECG-derived rMSSDHRV was limited, showing significant proportional bias and wide limits of agreement. A significant proportional bias was detected, producing back-transformed limits of agreement that demonstrated relative measurement errors ranging from –43% to +52% in the supine position and from –41% to +118% in the seated position in isolated individual cases. Ultimately, the Garmin Elevate v4 is highly reliable for basic HR tracking and within-subject PRV trends, but it lacks the absolute accuracy required to replace reference ECG-derived HRV for individual resting autonomic evaluation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26206549
Primary Topic
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Pulse vs. R-R Interval: Validity and Reliability of the Garmin Elevate v4 Sensor for Ultra-Short HR and HRV Monitoring in Healthy Adults

José Manuel Sarabia, Manuel Moya‐Ramón, Antonio Casanova‐Lizón, Mario Martínez-García et al.
Sensors
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
article

Pulse vs. R-R Interval: Validity and Reliability of the Garmin Elevate v4 Sensor for Ultra-Short HR and HRV Monitoring in Healthy Adults

José Manuel Sarabia, Manuel Moya‐Ramón, Antonio Casanova‐Lizón, Mario Martínez-García, Adolfo Aracil‐Marco, Agustín Manresa‐Rocamora
article en

Abstract

Accurate resting heart rate (HR) and heart rate variability (HRV) monitoring is crucial for evaluating autonomic nervous system balance and guiding training. This study investigated the validity and reliability of the Garmin Forerunner 955 smartwatch (Elevate v4 sensor) against an electrocardiogram (ECG) reference for measuring resting HR and photoplethysmography (PPG)-derived pulse rate variability (PRV), evaluated through the root mean square of successive differences (rMSSDPRV), compared to reference ECG-derived HRV (rMSSDHRV). Twenty-three healthy adults underwent simultaneous assessments using the smartwatch and a Biopac ECG during short recordings in supine and seated positions under controlled breathing. For resting HR, the optical device demonstrated a near-perfect linear association (r ≥ 0.94) and substantial concordance with the ECG. While rMSSDPRV demonstrated good-to-excellent intrasession test–retest reliability, its agreement with ECG-derived rMSSDHRV was limited, showing significant proportional bias and wide limits of agreement. A significant proportional bias was detected, producing back-transformed limits of agreement that demonstrated relative measurement errors ranging from –43% to +52% in the supine position and from –41% to +118% in the seated position in isolated individual cases. Ultimately, the Garmin Elevate v4 is highly reliable for basic HR tracking and within-subject PRV trends, but it lacks the absolute accuracy required to replace reference ECG-derived HRV for individual resting autonomic evaluation.

SensorsVol. 26(20)
Universitat de Miguel Hernández d'Elx (ES), Instituto de Investigación Sanitaria y Biomédica de Alicante (ISABIAL) (ES)
Ministerio de Ciencia e Innovación
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 24%
Non-Invasive Vital Sign Monitoring
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.