Effects of active rehabilitation on gait, balance and postural stability in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis

Cerebral palsy is the most common developmental motor disorder in childhood. Gait abnormalities and balance impairments are core issues affecting children’s activity participation. Active motor rehabilitation has been widely applied, yet systematic comparisons of the relative effects among different intervention modalities remain lacking. To systematically evaluate the effects of active motor rehabilitation on gait, balance, and postural stability in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy whose reported mean ages ranged from 6.2 to 15.9 years, and to compare effect patterns across intervention modalities, outcome measures, age groups, and cerebral palsy topographic distributions. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 19, 2026. Randomized controlled trials evaluating active motor rehabilitation in children and adolescents with CP were included; the included studies reported mean ages ranging from 6.2 to 15.9 years. Hedges’ g was synthesized using a three-level random-effects model. Analyses examined outcome category, intervention modality, CP topography, age group, and training dosage; robustness was assessed by leave-one-study-out sensitivity analysis. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420261459915. Twenty-six RCTs contributed 58 effect sizes. The broad cross-domain estimate was significant (g = 0.511, 95% CI: 0.299–0.724, p < 0.001), with I²₂ = 65.9%, I²₃ = 7.9%, and a 95% prediction interval of − 0.774 to 1.796. Outcome-specific analyses showed significant effects for balance function (g = 0.554, p = 0.008) and postural stability (g = 0.889, p = 0.043). In the intervention-modality analysis, balance training showed the highest pooled point estimate (g = 1.038, p = 0.046), while the between-modality test was not significant ( p = 0.214). Between-subgroup tests were also not significant for outcome category, CP topography, or age. Based on current evidence, active motor rehabilitation can serve as an effective component of individualized motor-function management for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Although between-subgroup tests were not statistically significant, the effect estimates indicated clearer benefits for balance function and postural stability, and balance training showed the highest pooled point estimate among intervention modalities. Structured balance training may therefore be considered when balance function or postural control is the treatment target.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
BMC Pediatrics
Published
2026-10-14
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12887-026-07862-8
Primary Topic
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Effects of active rehabilitation on gait, balance and postural stability in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis

Yuhao You, Lei He, Zhiqiang Ji, Yuqi Jia et al.
BMC Pediatrics
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
article

Effects of active rehabilitation on gait, balance and postural stability in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy: a systematic review and three-level meta-analysis

Yuhao You, Lei He, Zhiqiang Ji, Yuqi Jia, Ying He, Huixia Yang
article en

Abstract

Cerebral palsy is the most common developmental motor disorder in childhood. Gait abnormalities and balance impairments are core issues affecting children’s activity participation. Active motor rehabilitation has been widely applied, yet systematic comparisons of the relative effects among different intervention modalities remain lacking. To systematically evaluate the effects of active motor rehabilitation on gait, balance, and postural stability in children and adolescents with cerebral palsy whose reported mean ages ranged from 6.2 to 15.9 years, and to compare effect patterns across intervention modalities, outcome measures, age groups, and cerebral palsy topographic distributions. PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane Library were searched from inception to June 19, 2026. Randomized controlled trials evaluating active motor rehabilitation in children and adolescents with CP were included; the included studies reported mean ages ranging from 6.2 to 15.9 years. Hedges’ g was synthesized using a three-level random-effects model. Analyses examined outcome category, intervention modality, CP topography, age group, and training dosage; robustness was assessed by leave-one-study-out sensitivity analysis. PROSPERO registration number: CRD420261459915. Twenty-six RCTs contributed 58 effect sizes. The broad cross-domain estimate was significant (g = 0.511, 95% CI: 0.299–0.724, p < 0.001), with I²₂ = 65.9%, I²₃ = 7.9%, and a 95% prediction interval of − 0.774 to 1.796. Outcome-specific analyses showed significant effects for balance function (g = 0.554, p = 0.008) and postural stability (g = 0.889, p = 0.043). In the intervention-modality analysis, balance training showed the highest pooled point estimate (g = 1.038, p = 0.046), while the between-modality test was not significant ( p = 0.214). Between-subgroup tests were also not significant for outcome category, CP topography, or age. Based on current evidence, active motor rehabilitation can serve as an effective component of individualized motor-function management for children and adolescents with cerebral palsy. Although between-subgroup tests were not statistically significant, the effect estimates indicated clearer benefits for balance function and postural stability, and balance training showed the highest pooled point estimate among intervention modalities. Structured balance training may therefore be considered when balance function or postural control is the treatment target.

BMC Pediatrics
Tongji University (CN), Southwest University (CN), Chengdu Sport University (CN), Nanjing Sport Institute (CN), Huangshan University (CN), Chizhou University (CN)
Openalex Percentile: Top 12%
Cerebral Palsy and Movement Disorders
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.