Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Integration of Residual Kidney Function in Hemodialysis Prescription: A Global Scoping Review

BACKGROUND: Residual kidney function (RKF) is strongly associated with improved outcomes in patients receiving hemodialysis, and incremental hemodialysis-where dialysis dose and frequency are tailored to RKF-has gained increasing attention. However, the extent to which hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide actionable guidance for RKF-based prescribing remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA ScR reporting. National and international adult hemodialysis CPGs were identified through database and organizational website searches (inception-December 2025). Guidelines were classified by depth of RKF integration into three tiers: Tier 3 (no RKF guidance), Tier 2 (conceptual acknowledgment without operational protocols), and Tier 1 (explicit, operational RKF-based prescribing frameworks). RESULTS: Twelve guideline documents were included. Five were classified as Tier 3, providing no RKF guidance for chronic hemodialysis prescribing. Three were Tier 2 guidelines which acknowledged RKF and provided the concept of incremental hemodialysis but did not have standardized thresholds or implementation pathways. Four guidelines met Tier 1 criteria; among these, one provided a fully specified, mathematically integrated framework linking RKF measurement to adequacy targets, monitoring frequency, and eligibility for reduced-frequency dialysis. Other Tier 1 guidelines endorsed incremental hemodialysis or RKF quantification but offered limited detail on measurement protocols, thresholds, or dose adjustment, resulting in substantial heterogeneity across approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Despite growing interest in RKF-informed hemodialysis, most CPGs offer limited operational guidance. Fully actionable frameworks are rare, underscoring the need for future guidelines to standardize RKF measurement, integration into adequacy targets, and monitoring strategies to support consistent clinical implementation.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Hemodialysis International
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1111/hdi.70123
Primary Topic
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Integration of Residual Kidney Function in Hemodialysis Prescription: A Global Scoping Review

Mariana Murea, Alaa S. Awad, Emaad M. Abdel‐Rahman, Hiba I Sheikh et al.
Hemodialysis International
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
article

Clinical Practice Guidelines on the Integration of Residual Kidney Function in Hemodialysis Prescription: A Global Scoping Review

Mariana Murea, Alaa S. Awad, Emaad M. Abdel‐Rahman, Hiba I Sheikh, Samir C. Gautam, Jobira A. Woldemichael, Olivia R. Warfel
article en

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Residual kidney function (RKF) is strongly associated with improved outcomes in patients receiving hemodialysis, and incremental hemodialysis-where dialysis dose and frequency are tailored to RKF-has gained increasing attention. However, the extent to which hemodialysis clinical practice guidelines (CPGs) provide actionable guidance for RKF-based prescribing remains unclear. METHODS: We conducted a scoping review using Joanna Briggs Institute methodology and PRISMA ScR reporting. National and international adult hemodialysis CPGs were identified through database and organizational website searches (inception-December 2025). Guidelines were classified by depth of RKF integration into three tiers: Tier 3 (no RKF guidance), Tier 2 (conceptual acknowledgment without operational protocols), and Tier 1 (explicit, operational RKF-based prescribing frameworks). RESULTS: Twelve guideline documents were included. Five were classified as Tier 3, providing no RKF guidance for chronic hemodialysis prescribing. Three were Tier 2 guidelines which acknowledged RKF and provided the concept of incremental hemodialysis but did not have standardized thresholds or implementation pathways. Four guidelines met Tier 1 criteria; among these, one provided a fully specified, mathematically integrated framework linking RKF measurement to adequacy targets, monitoring frequency, and eligibility for reduced-frequency dialysis. Other Tier 1 guidelines endorsed incremental hemodialysis or RKF quantification but offered limited detail on measurement protocols, thresholds, or dose adjustment, resulting in substantial heterogeneity across approaches. CONCLUSIONS: Despite growing interest in RKF-informed hemodialysis, most CPGs offer limited operational guidance. Fully actionable frameworks are rare, underscoring the need for future guidelines to standardize RKF measurement, integration into adequacy targets, and monitoring strategies to support consistent clinical implementation.

Hemodialysis International
University of North Florida (US), Johns Hopkins University (US), University of Virginia Health System (US), Johns Hopkins Medicine (US), Jacksonville University (US), Wake Forest University Health Sciences (US), Wake Forest University (US), University of Florida Health Science Center (US), Florida College (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Dialysis and Renal Disease Management
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.