Operations of Mind: A framework for emergent thinking

Thinking is not hardcoded, and it cannot be. This note sets out Operations of Mind (OoM), a framework inwhich a machine is not given a method of thinking but a small set of basic mental operations, a drive tomake sense of what it encounters, and the freedom to chain those operations itself. OoM divides thoughtinto two deliberate layers: an inner layer that runs continuously and cheaply, and an active layer thatreasons deliberately on harder problems. It sits on two earlier pieces of the LOCUS programme, theCoherent World Hypothesis (CWH), which serves as its imagination, and the Repertoire Hypothesis, whichserves as its memory. The central bet is that thinking does not have to be trained into a machine; it canemerge from a small set of basic mental operations, chained under a drive to make sense. First tests ingenerated worlds give early support: operation chains grown from use beat chains built blindly, the driveignores noise without being told to, and see-then-invent beat a plain counting baseline for the first time,with a control showing the gain tracks real hidden structure. The gains are small, about 1.5 points ofroughly 5 learnable in a 60-step budget, and the active layer is untested. This note is a framework withpreliminary evidence, not a validated result.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-16
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23406117
Primary Topic
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Operations of Mind: A framework for emergent thinking

Sebastian Vaderaa
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
article

Operations of Mind: A framework for emergent thinking

Sebastian Vaderaa
article en

Abstract

Thinking is not hardcoded, and it cannot be. This note sets out Operations of Mind (OoM), a framework inwhich a machine is not given a method of thinking but a small set of basic mental operations, a drive tomake sense of what it encounters, and the freedom to chain those operations itself. OoM divides thoughtinto two deliberate layers: an inner layer that runs continuously and cheaply, and an active layer thatreasons deliberately on harder problems. It sits on two earlier pieces of the LOCUS programme, theCoherent World Hypothesis (CWH), which serves as its imagination, and the Repertoire Hypothesis, whichserves as its memory. The central bet is that thinking does not have to be trained into a machine; it canemerge from a small set of basic mental operations, chained under a drive to make sense. First tests ingenerated worlds give early support: operation chains grown from use beat chains built blindly, the driveignores noise without being told to, and see-then-invent beat a plain counting baseline for the first time,with a control showing the gain tracks real hidden structure. The gains are small, about 1.5 points ofroughly 5 learnable in a 60-step budget, and the active layer is untested. This note is a framework withpreliminary evidence, not a validated result.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Psychiatry, Mental Health, Neuroscience
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.