Local Distance Seismic Source Discrimination in the United Kingdom Using P/S Amplitude Ratios and Machine Learning

ABSTRACT Seismic source discriminants comparing earthquakes and explosions have been validated for large-magnitude events (local magnitude, ML>3.5) detected at regional and greater distances (>350 km). However, there is less evidence that existing seismic source discriminants apply to small-magnitude seismic events (ML≤3.5), which are predominantly detected at local distances (≤350 km). In this study, we investigate the performance of a P/S amplitude ratio discriminant for 210 small-magnitude seismic events in the United Kingdom (UK). High-frequency (> 8 Hz) network-averaged P/S ratios can discriminate between earthquakes and explosions, whereas low frequencies (2–4 Hz) can separate offshore explosions and quarry blasts. We derive a path and site amplitude correction model that reduces P/S ratio distribution variability, but using discrimination metrics we show that simple across-network averaging is the most important step to allow effective discrimination. We also applied a machine learning classification model, previously trained to discriminate earthquakes and explosions in France, to our dataset. The model demonstrates high classification accuracy, likely due to similarities between geology and seismic sources in France and the UK. When the predictions from the convolutional neural network are combined with high-frequency P/S ratios, we are able to distinguish other seismic sources, such as longwall mining-induced earthquakes. These results suggest that P/S ratios can be considered a useful seismic source discriminant at local distances across the UK, and network-averaging sufficiently accounts for non-source factors.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1785/0120260152
Primary Topic
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Local Distance Seismic Source Discrimination in the United Kingdom Using P/S Amplitude Ratios and Machine Learning

David N. Green, Richard Luckett, Stuart E. J. Nippress, Max Merrett
Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
article

Local Distance Seismic Source Discrimination in the United Kingdom Using P/S Amplitude Ratios and Machine Learning

David N. Green, Richard Luckett, Stuart E. J. Nippress, Max Merrett
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Seismic source discriminants comparing earthquakes and explosions have been validated for large-magnitude events (local magnitude, ML>3.5) detected at regional and greater distances (>350 km). However, there is less evidence that existing seismic source discriminants apply to small-magnitude seismic events (ML≤3.5), which are predominantly detected at local distances (≤350 km). In this study, we investigate the performance of a P/S amplitude ratio discriminant for 210 small-magnitude seismic events in the United Kingdom (UK). High-frequency (> 8 Hz) network-averaged P/S ratios can discriminate between earthquakes and explosions, whereas low frequencies (2–4 Hz) can separate offshore explosions and quarry blasts. We derive a path and site amplitude correction model that reduces P/S ratio distribution variability, but using discrimination metrics we show that simple across-network averaging is the most important step to allow effective discrimination. We also applied a machine learning classification model, previously trained to discriminate earthquakes and explosions in France, to our dataset. The model demonstrates high classification accuracy, likely due to similarities between geology and seismic sources in France and the UK. When the predictions from the convolutional neural network are combined with high-frequency P/S ratios, we are able to distinguish other seismic sources, such as longwall mining-induced earthquakes. These results suggest that P/S ratios can be considered a useful seismic source discriminant at local distances across the UK, and network-averaging sufficiently accounts for non-source factors.

Bulletin of the Seismological Society of America
British Geological Survey (GB)
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Seismology and Earthquake Studies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.