Prostate cancer screening with MRI: insights from the ESUR Prostate MRI Working Group

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial due to uncertain long-term benefits, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment of indolent disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has transformed the diagnostic pathway of PCa and is increasingly explored as a screening tool. This special report from the ESUR Prostate MRI Working Group provides an overview of current evidence and insights into the potential role of MRI in PCa screening. MRI-based screening strategies appear to improve detection of clinically significant PCa while reducing unnecessary biopsies and diagnoses of non-significant disease, though long-term outcome data, including mortality impact and interval cancer rates, remain limited. Biparametric MRI is particularly suited for screening due to its shorter acquisition time, reduced operational complexity, and lower costs compared with multiparametric MRI. Two main implementation approaches have emerged: MRI-first pathways, which maximise detection but require substantial resources, and risk-stratified strategies, in which MRI is used after initial assessment (e.g. PSA), potentially offering greater feasibility and cost-effectiveness. Evidence from large trials supports integrating MRI into screening pathways, particularly as a reflex test after PSA screening, although uncertainties remain regarding optimal protocols, interpretation thresholds, follow-up strategies, and long-term outcomes. Key barriers include limited MRI capacity, economic considerations, and the need for standardisation and quality assurance. Advances in artificial intelligence may further enhance efficiency. Overall, MRI has the potential to improve the balance between benefits and harms in PCa screening, but further evidence is required to define its optimal implementation. KEY POINTS: Question Can prostate MRI be effectively integrated into population-based prostate cancer screening pathways? Findings MRI-based screening improves detection of csPCa while reducing unnecessary biopsies; biparametric MRI should be the protocol of choice to enhance feasibility, although optimal implementation and long-term outcomes remain uncertain. Clinical relevance MRI may overcome key limitations of PSA-based screening by enhancing the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer while reducing harms such as overdiagnosis and unnecessary biopsies.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
European Radiology
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1007/s00330-026-12863-3
Primary Topic
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Prostate cancer screening with MRI: insights from the ESUR Prostate MRI Working Group

Guglielmo Manenti, Ahmet Tuncay Turgut, Adalgisa Guerra, Roberto García Figueiras et al.
European Radiology
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
article

Prostate cancer screening with MRI: insights from the ESUR Prostate MRI Working Group

Guglielmo Manenti, Ahmet Tuncay Turgut, Adalgisa Guerra, Roberto García Figueiras, Valeria Panebianco, Jelle O. Barentsz, Andrea Ponsiglione, Emanuele Messina, Giorgio Brembilla, Charlie Alexander Hamm, Jonathan Richenberg, Jeries Paolo Zawaideh, Renato Cuocolo, Joan Carles Vilanova, Iztok Caglič, Rossano Girometti, Maarten de Rooij, on behalf of the ESUR Prostate MRI Working Group, Harriet Thoeny, Sam J. Withey, Raphaële Renard Penna, Evis Sala, Tristan Barret
article en

Abstract

Prostate-specific antigen (PSA)-based screening for prostate cancer (PCa) remains controversial due to uncertain long-term benefits, overdiagnosis, and overtreatment of indolent disease. Magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) has transformed the diagnostic pathway of PCa and is increasingly explored as a screening tool. This special report from the ESUR Prostate MRI Working Group provides an overview of current evidence and insights into the potential role of MRI in PCa screening. MRI-based screening strategies appear to improve detection of clinically significant PCa while reducing unnecessary biopsies and diagnoses of non-significant disease, though long-term outcome data, including mortality impact and interval cancer rates, remain limited. Biparametric MRI is particularly suited for screening due to its shorter acquisition time, reduced operational complexity, and lower costs compared with multiparametric MRI. Two main implementation approaches have emerged: MRI-first pathways, which maximise detection but require substantial resources, and risk-stratified strategies, in which MRI is used after initial assessment (e.g. PSA), potentially offering greater feasibility and cost-effectiveness. Evidence from large trials supports integrating MRI into screening pathways, particularly as a reflex test after PSA screening, although uncertainties remain regarding optimal protocols, interpretation thresholds, follow-up strategies, and long-term outcomes. Key barriers include limited MRI capacity, economic considerations, and the need for standardisation and quality assurance. Advances in artificial intelligence may further enhance efficiency. Overall, MRI has the potential to improve the balance between benefits and harms in PCa screening, but further evidence is required to define its optimal implementation. KEY POINTS: Question Can prostate MRI be effectively integrated into population-based prostate cancer screening pathways? Findings MRI-based screening improves detection of csPCa while reducing unnecessary biopsies; biparametric MRI should be the protocol of choice to enhance feasibility, although optimal implementation and long-term outcomes remain uncertain. Clinical relevance MRI may overcome key limitations of PSA-based screening by enhancing the detection of clinically significant prostate cancer while reducing harms such as overdiagnosis and unnecessary biopsies.

European Radiology
Brighton and Sussex Medical School (GB), Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore (IT), University College Hospital (GB), University of Salerno (IT), University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust (GB), University of Fribourg (CH), Vita-Salute San Raffaele University (IT), Universitat de Girona (ES), Policlinico Umberto I (IT), Agostino Gemelli University Polyclinic (IT), Radboud University Medical Center (NL), Humboldt-Universität zu Berlin (DE), Sorbonne Université (FR), Clínica Girona (ES), Complejo Hospitalario Universitario de Santiago (ES), Assistance Publique – Hôpitaux de Paris (FR), Fribourg Development Agency (CH), Royal Marsden Hospital (GB), Pitié-Salpêtrière Hospital (FR), Ospedale Santa Maria della Misericordia di Udine (IT), Hospital da Luz (PT), Andros Mannenkliniek (NL), Policlinico Tor Vergata (IT), Berlin Institute of Health at Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin (DE), University Hospitals Sussex NHS Foundation Trust (GB), Addenbrooke's Hospital (GB), IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliera Metropolitana (IT), University College London (GB), University of Naples Federico II (IT), Sapienza University of Rome (IT)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Prostate Cancer Diagnosis and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.