Can Lateral Cyclic Reactive Jump Ability Be Reliably Measured Using an Inertial Measurement Unit?

Jump testing is widely used to assess lower-limb power, force absorption, and stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) function; however, lateral cyclic tests remain underexplored despite their relevance to change-of-direction performance. This study determined the intra- and inter-session reliability of a novel cyclic lateral leg power test using an inertial measurement unit (IMU). Seventeen female athletes completed three identical testing sessions separated by seven days. Participants performed 10 consecutive lateral bounds at distances of 1.0×, 1.25×, and 1.5× leg length on each limb. A foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) (Output Sports Ltd., Dublin, Ireland) quantified contact time (CT) and air time (AT), with the five shortest values for each variable analyzed. Reliability was assessed using percent change in the mean, coefficients of variation (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Between-session changes were small (−7.9% to 6.6%), with no significant session effects for CT or AT. CVs ranged from 9.2% to 21.8%, with only CT at 1.0× leg length between Sessions 1 and 2 below 10%. ICCs ranged from 0.12 to 0.76, indicating poor-to-good relative reliability. Overall, the IMU-instrumented lateral cyclic test demonstrated largely unacceptable reliability, particularly at greater jump distances, indicating that further protocol refinement is required before implementation in clinical or performance settings.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Sensors
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/s26206532
Primary Topic
Sports Performance and Training
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Can Lateral Cyclic Reactive Jump Ability Be Reliably Measured Using an Inertial Measurement Unit?

John Barry Cronin, Alex Ehlert, Christopher Slocum, Margaret M. Michalak et al.
Sensors
Sports Performance and Training
article

Can Lateral Cyclic Reactive Jump Ability Be Reliably Measured Using an Inertial Measurement Unit?

John Barry Cronin, Alex Ehlert, Christopher Slocum, Margaret M. Michalak, Chloe M. Ryan, Leslie Bennett, Yuxiao Lian, Hailey Villarreal
article en

Abstract

Jump testing is widely used to assess lower-limb power, force absorption, and stretch-shortening cycle (SSC) function; however, lateral cyclic tests remain underexplored despite their relevance to change-of-direction performance. This study determined the intra- and inter-session reliability of a novel cyclic lateral leg power test using an inertial measurement unit (IMU). Seventeen female athletes completed three identical testing sessions separated by seven days. Participants performed 10 consecutive lateral bounds at distances of 1.0×, 1.25×, and 1.5× leg length on each limb. A foot-mounted inertial measurement unit (IMU) (Output Sports Ltd., Dublin, Ireland) quantified contact time (CT) and air time (AT), with the five shortest values for each variable analyzed. Reliability was assessed using percent change in the mean, coefficients of variation (CV), and intraclass correlation coefficients (ICC). Between-session changes were small (−7.9% to 6.6%), with no significant session effects for CT or AT. CVs ranged from 9.2% to 21.8%, with only CT at 1.0× leg length between Sessions 1 and 2 below 10%. ICCs ranged from 0.12 to 0.76, indicating poor-to-good relative reliability. Overall, the IMU-instrumented lateral cyclic test demonstrated largely unacceptable reliability, particularly at greater jump distances, indicating that further protocol refinement is required before implementation in clinical or performance settings.

SensorsVol. 26(20)
University of St. Thomas - Texas (US), Toi Ohomai Institute of Technology (NZ), Auckland University of Technology (NZ), Tauranga Hospital (NZ)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Sports Performance and Training
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.