Lean but strained: a socio-technical explanation of the safety paradox in just-in-time modular construction

Purpose Although just-in-time (JIT) systems drive efficiency, their underlying trade-offs regarding employee safety in modular construction remain critically under-researched. Addressing this gap in socio-technical operations literature, this study investigates the impact of JIT practices on employee safety and evaluates how operational strain and supplier integration alter this relationship in low-slack production environments. Design/methodology/approach A two-wave, multi-informant survey design was employed to separate predictor and outcome variables across respondents and time, thereby reducing common-method bias. Data were collected from 346 matched responses from managerial and frontline personnel across 103 modular construction firms operating in a developing economy context characterised by high supply variability and infrastructural constraint. The hypothesised moderated mediation model was estimated using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), with robustness verified through a Gaussian Copula endogeneity correction, full collinearity assessment, and PLSpredict cross-validated predictive relevance. Findings Results show that JIT is positively associated with employee safety but simultaneously increases operational strain. Contrary to a priori expectation, operational strain is positively associated with safety, suggesting short-term compensatory vigilance, and consistent with HRO theory. Mediation analysis reveals that operational strain partially explains the JIT–safety relationship. Furthermore, high supply reliability attenuates the strain-inducing effects of JIT, serving as a stabilising boundary condition. Practical implications Managers should align JIT implementation with supply reliability and closely monitor operational strain to sustain efficiency without compromising worker safety. Originality/value The study conceptualises JIT as a variability-redistribution mechanism that reallocates operational pressures to frontline employees, offering a behavioural explanation for the lean–safety relationship in Prefabricated-JIT systems.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1108/ijieom-04-2026-0119
Primary Topic
Occupational Health and Safety Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Lean but strained: a socio-technical explanation of the safety paradox in just-in-time modular construction

John Nsikan
International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
Occupational Health and Safety Research
article

Lean but strained: a socio-technical explanation of the safety paradox in just-in-time modular construction

John Nsikan
article en

Abstract

Purpose Although just-in-time (JIT) systems drive efficiency, their underlying trade-offs regarding employee safety in modular construction remain critically under-researched. Addressing this gap in socio-technical operations literature, this study investigates the impact of JIT practices on employee safety and evaluates how operational strain and supplier integration alter this relationship in low-slack production environments. Design/methodology/approach A two-wave, multi-informant survey design was employed to separate predictor and outcome variables across respondents and time, thereby reducing common-method bias. Data were collected from 346 matched responses from managerial and frontline personnel across 103 modular construction firms operating in a developing economy context characterised by high supply variability and infrastructural constraint. The hypothesised moderated mediation model was estimated using Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modelling (PLS-SEM), with robustness verified through a Gaussian Copula endogeneity correction, full collinearity assessment, and PLSpredict cross-validated predictive relevance. Findings Results show that JIT is positively associated with employee safety but simultaneously increases operational strain. Contrary to a priori expectation, operational strain is positively associated with safety, suggesting short-term compensatory vigilance, and consistent with HRO theory. Mediation analysis reveals that operational strain partially explains the JIT–safety relationship. Furthermore, high supply reliability attenuates the strain-inducing effects of JIT, serving as a stabilising boundary condition. Practical implications Managers should align JIT implementation with supply reliability and closely monitor operational strain to sustain efficiency without compromising worker safety. Originality/value The study conceptualises JIT as a variability-redistribution mechanism that reallocates operational pressures to frontline employees, offering a behavioural explanation for the lean–safety relationship in Prefabricated-JIT systems.

International Journal of Industrial Engineering and Operations Management
James Hope University (NG)
Decent work and economic growth, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
Occupational Health and Safety Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.