A dual-scale study on the permeability and wicking performance of plain knitted fabrics based on experiment and simulation

The development of sweat-management knitwear and garments has been a recent research hotspot, but studies on the transfer of liquid water within knitwear based on microstructures are scarce. This study focused on plain knitted structures, using recycled polyester yarn (50D/24F) to knit five samples with different densities. The vertical wicking height was measured within 30 min. The results showed that the higher the density, the greater the wicking height per minute in the first 13 min. After 13 min, the wicking height of Sample 1 (lowest density) gradually decreased compared to Sample 2 (lower density). Through microscopic measurement characterization and macroscopic experiments, using the fabric measurement-calculation method (FMM), the permeability K FMM in the warp and weft directions are between 6.33 × 10 −13 –15.91 × 10 −13 m 2 and 5.97 × 10 −13 –14.81 × 10 −13 m 2 , respectively. Using the empirical parameter C at 15 min, the simulated values at this time point most closely match the experimental values, with the warp error not exceeding 3% and the weft error not exceeding 4%. At 30 min, the maximum error is less than 15.7%; in the weft direction, and the maximum is less than 19.8%; using the Micro-CT scanning-calculation method 1 (method-MSM-1), the permeability K MSM-1 in the warp and weft directions are between 5.11 × 10 −13 –12.42 × 10 −13 m 2 and 4.82 × 10 −13 –11.56 × 10 −13 m 2 , respectively. Similar results were obtained using the method-MSM-1 compared to method-FMM. Additionally, it considered the tortuosity of capillaries in the fabric. Based on method-MSM-2, the warp and weft permeability K MSM-2 are between 6.55 × 10 −13 –23.31 × 10 −13 m 2 and 6.16 × 10 −13 –21.94 × 10 −13 m 2 . In the warp direction, the simulated values for sample 1 remain within 1.5 cm of the experimental values up to 240 s, while those for samples 3 and 5 do so up to 660 s; the respective relative errors for samples 1, 3, and 5 are no greater than 12%, 18%, and 20%, respectively. In the weft direction, the simulated values for sample 1 stay within 1.5 cm of the experimental values up to 300 s, and those for samples 3 and 5 do so up to 660 s; the respective relative errors for samples 1, 3, and 5 are no greater than 13%, 19%, and 21%. Through the simulation analysis of the capillary absorption process, this study provides theoretical support for the development of a new generation of one-way moisture-wicking fabrics.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1016/j.icheatmasstransfer.2026.112859
Primary Topic
Textile materials and evaluations
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

A dual-scale study on the permeability and wicking performance of plain knitted fabrics based on experiment and simulation

Peng Xu, Qing Chen, Xinyu Li, Xingmin Li et al.
International Communications in Heat and Mass Transfer
Textile materials and evaluations
article

A dual-scale study on the permeability and wicking performance of plain knitted fabrics based on experiment and simulation

Peng Xu, Qing Chen, Xinyu Li, Xingmin Li, Jianing Jiang
article en

Abstract

The development of sweat-management knitwear and garments has been a recent research hotspot, but studies on the transfer of liquid water within knitwear based on microstructures are scarce. This study focused on plain knitted structures, using recycled polyester yarn (50D/24F) to knit five samples with different densities. The vertical wicking height was measured within 30 min. The results showed that the higher the density, the greater the wicking height per minute in the first 13 min. After 13 min, the wicking height of Sample 1 (lowest density) gradually decreased compared to Sample 2 (lower density). Through microscopic measurement characterization and macroscopic experiments, using the fabric measurement-calculation method (FMM), the permeability K FMM in the warp and weft directions are between 6.33 × 10 −13 –15.91 × 10 −13 m 2 and 5.97 × 10 −13 –14.81 × 10 −13 m 2 , respectively. Using the empirical parameter C at 15 min, the simulated values at this time point most closely match the experimental values, with the warp error not exceeding 3% and the weft error not exceeding 4%. At 30 min, the maximum error is less than 15.7%; in the weft direction, and the maximum is less than 19.8%; using the Micro-CT scanning-calculation method 1 (method-MSM-1), the permeability K MSM-1 in the warp and weft directions are between 5.11 × 10 −13 –12.42 × 10 −13 m 2 and 4.82 × 10 −13 –11.56 × 10 −13 m 2 , respectively. Similar results were obtained using the method-MSM-1 compared to method-FMM. Additionally, it considered the tortuosity of capillaries in the fabric. Based on method-MSM-2, the warp and weft permeability K MSM-2 are between 6.55 × 10 −13 –23.31 × 10 −13 m 2 and 6.16 × 10 −13 –21.94 × 10 −13 m 2 . In the warp direction, the simulated values for sample 1 remain within 1.5 cm of the experimental values up to 240 s, while those for samples 3 and 5 do so up to 660 s; the respective relative errors for samples 1, 3, and 5 are no greater than 12%, 18%, and 20%, respectively. In the weft direction, the simulated values for sample 1 stay within 1.5 cm of the experimental values up to 300 s, and those for samples 3 and 5 do so up to 660 s; the respective relative errors for samples 1, 3, and 5 are no greater than 13%, 19%, and 21%. Through the simulation analysis of the capillary absorption process, this study provides theoretical support for the development of a new generation of one-way moisture-wicking fabrics.

International Communications in Heat and Mass TransferVol. 180
Donghua University (CN), China Jiliang University (CN)
National Natural Science Foundation of China, Natural Science Foundation of Zhejiang Province
Openalex Percentile: Top 26%
Textile materials and evaluations
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.