Insurance and altruism values of a novel treatment for hypophosphatasia: a stated preference survey in the United States

AIMS: To estimate the insurance and altruism values of a novel hypothetical treatment on survival gains for perinatal-/infantile-onset hypophosphatasia (HPP), a rare, severe, inherited disease, which-if untreated-leads to early mortality in children. METHODS: Residents of the United States aged 21-54 years from the general population participated in a web-based, cross-sectional, prospective, stated preference survey. The insurance value module included respondents planning to have children, whereas the altruism value module included respondents not planning to have children in the future. A multiple random staircase survey design was utilized to assess respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) for insurance coverage of the novel HPP treatment offering survival gains. RESULTS: = 254) were included in the insurance value and altruism value modules, respectively. Overall, 72.2% of the respondents were aged 30-49 years (insurance module: 72.4% and altruism module: 72.0%) and 52.8% were men (insurance module: 56.8% and altruism module: 48.8%). For generous coverage of the novel HPP treatment, the mean WTP was $10.35/month or $124.22/year as additional health insurance premiums for the insurance value module (insurance value makes 90.1% of the total treatment value). The mean WTP was $9.40/month or $112.85/year as taxes for the altruism value module. CONCLUSION: The high insurance and altruism values for the novel HPP treatment, which can significantly improve survival, suggest that health gains for children may be valued more highly than similar health gains for adults, especially in a rare disease context.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of Medical Economics
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/13696998.2026.2745425
Primary Topic
Economic and Environmental Valuation
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Insurance and altruism values of a novel treatment for hypophosphatasia: a stated preference survey in the United States

Kyi‐Sin Than, Jason T. Shafrin, Craig Wakeford, Andrew J. Messali et al.
Journal of Medical Economics
Economic and Environmental Valuation
article

Insurance and altruism values of a novel treatment for hypophosphatasia: a stated preference survey in the United States

Kyi‐Sin Than, Jason T. Shafrin, Craig Wakeford, Andrew J. Messali, Kathryn Spurrier
article en

Abstract

AIMS: To estimate the insurance and altruism values of a novel hypothetical treatment on survival gains for perinatal-/infantile-onset hypophosphatasia (HPP), a rare, severe, inherited disease, which-if untreated-leads to early mortality in children. METHODS: Residents of the United States aged 21-54 years from the general population participated in a web-based, cross-sectional, prospective, stated preference survey. The insurance value module included respondents planning to have children, whereas the altruism value module included respondents not planning to have children in the future. A multiple random staircase survey design was utilized to assess respondents' willingness to pay (WTP) for insurance coverage of the novel HPP treatment offering survival gains. RESULTS: = 254) were included in the insurance value and altruism value modules, respectively. Overall, 72.2% of the respondents were aged 30-49 years (insurance module: 72.4% and altruism module: 72.0%) and 52.8% were men (insurance module: 56.8% and altruism module: 48.8%). For generous coverage of the novel HPP treatment, the mean WTP was $10.35/month or $124.22/year as additional health insurance premiums for the insurance value module (insurance value makes 90.1% of the total treatment value). The mean WTP was $9.40/month or $112.85/year as taxes for the altruism value module. CONCLUSION: The high insurance and altruism values for the novel HPP treatment, which can significantly improve survival, suggest that health gains for children may be valued more highly than similar health gains for adults, especially in a rare disease context.

Journal of Medical EconomicsVol. 29(1)
Health Economics and Outcomes Research (United Kingdom) (GB), Alexion Pharma (Switzerland) (CH)
AstraZeneca, Alexion Pharmaceuticals
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Economic and Environmental Valuation
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.