Changes in Midrange and End Range Adjacent Segment Motion 3 Years After One‐ Or Two‐Level Cervical Arthrodesis

ABSTRACT Background Biomechanical cadaver studies consistently find that cervical arthrodesis leads to increased motion adjacent to the arthrodesis. However, in vivo evidence indicates adjacent segment end range motion does not reliably increase at 1 year after one‐level or two‐level cervical arthrodesis. Because changes beyond 1 year remain unknown, this study assessed the effects of one‐ and two‐level cervical arthrodesis on adjacent segment motion 3 years after arthrodesis. Methods Sixty‐two patients were tested preoperatively (PRE), 1 year postoperatively (1YR‐POST), and 3 years postoperatively (3YR‐POST) along with 22 asymptomatic controls, who were tested once. A validated CT model‐based tracking technique was used to measure three‐dimensional (3D) vertebral motion from biplane radiographs acquired during dynamic flexion‐extension and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Adjacent segment intervertebral end range of motion (ROM) and midrange ROM (i.e. , head within 20° of neutral) were compared between one‐level and two‐level arthrodesis patients and controls after accounting for head ROM. Results End range adjacent segment motion tended to increase over time after arthrodesis; however, significant increases were found only after two‐level arthrodesis. In contrast, midrange adjacent segment motion increased significantly after one‐ and two‐level arthrodesis and was greater than in corresponding motion segments in controls. Conclusions Midrange adjacent segment motion may be better than end range motion for detecting early mechanical changes after cervical arthrodesis that could contribute to adjacent segment degeneration. In vivo changes in adjacent segment motion are inconsistent across patients up to 3 years after anterior cervical arthrodesis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
JOR Spine
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1002/jsp2.70224
Primary Topic
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00

Funders

Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Changes in Midrange and End Range Adjacent Segment Motion 3 Years After One‐ Or Two‐Level Cervical Arthrodesis

William F. Donaldson, David O. Okonkwo, Yan Ma, Jeremy D. Shaw et al.
JOR Spine
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
article

Changes in Midrange and End Range Adjacent Segment Motion 3 Years After One‐ Or Two‐Level Cervical Arthrodesis

William F. Donaldson, David O. Okonkwo, Yan Ma, Jeremy D. Shaw, Joon Y. Lee, Samuel W. Pitcairn, William J. Anderst, Clarissa M. LeVasseur, Xinyi Dan
article en

Abstract

ABSTRACT Background Biomechanical cadaver studies consistently find that cervical arthrodesis leads to increased motion adjacent to the arthrodesis. However, in vivo evidence indicates adjacent segment end range motion does not reliably increase at 1 year after one‐level or two‐level cervical arthrodesis. Because changes beyond 1 year remain unknown, this study assessed the effects of one‐ and two‐level cervical arthrodesis on adjacent segment motion 3 years after arthrodesis. Methods Sixty‐two patients were tested preoperatively (PRE), 1 year postoperatively (1YR‐POST), and 3 years postoperatively (3YR‐POST) along with 22 asymptomatic controls, who were tested once. A validated CT model‐based tracking technique was used to measure three‐dimensional (3D) vertebral motion from biplane radiographs acquired during dynamic flexion‐extension and axial rotation of the cervical spine. Adjacent segment intervertebral end range of motion (ROM) and midrange ROM (i.e. , head within 20° of neutral) were compared between one‐level and two‐level arthrodesis patients and controls after accounting for head ROM. Results End range adjacent segment motion tended to increase over time after arthrodesis; however, significant increases were found only after two‐level arthrodesis. In contrast, midrange adjacent segment motion increased significantly after one‐ and two‐level arthrodesis and was greater than in corresponding motion segments in controls. Conclusions Midrange adjacent segment motion may be better than end range motion for detecting early mechanical changes after cervical arthrodesis that could contribute to adjacent segment degeneration. In vivo changes in adjacent segment motion are inconsistent across patients up to 3 years after anterior cervical arthrodesis.

JOR SpineVol. 9(4)
University of Pittsburgh (US)
National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Arthritis and Musculoskeletal and Skin Diseases
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 10%
Cervical and Thoracic Myelopathy
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.