Only Means Only: what a harmonization benchmark score averages over

Image harmonization methods adjust the colour and lighting of an object pasted into a photograph so that it looks native to its new scene, and they are ranked by average error on one benchmark whose test images are real photographs with one object recoloured. One photograph can yield several such test images, and the benchmark promises that no photograph appears in both the training and the test split. We find that 1,399 photographs do, and the composites built on them are a quarter of the test set. Duplicate checks over file names or bytes miss this, because every composite is a different file. On that quarter the three methods we score end to end read two to five times lower error than on the rest, but most of the gap is composition rather than the sharing: the shared composites come almost entirely from one of the benchmark's four source collections, and inside that collection the gap falls to about one and a half times. An official score is therefore an average over two populations, mixed in a proportion the benchmark does not report. We release a test list of 5,581 composites whose construction identities do not appear in training, with four near-duplicate pairs disclosed rather than removed, adoptable without retraining at the price of one rescore per checkpoint. We leave open whether the sharing itself changes what a model learns. Contents of this record. The paper, the supplement, the LaTeX source of both, the record metadata and the licence statement. The identity matcher, the composite-locality and sensitivity checks, the CPU tests, the official iHarmony4 lists and the corrected test list are released under the MIT license at https://github.com/Buljic/only-means-only. What this record does not contain. No dataset, no images, no masks, no model checkpoints and no third-party baseline code or weights; those are described and cited by the paper and remain under their own terms. This is a preprint. It has not been peer reviewed. Licensed CC BY 4.0.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.23404529
Primary Topic
Digital Media Forensic Detection
Type
preprint
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
preprint

Only Means Only: what a harmonization benchmark score averages over

Imad Buljić, Delaida Muminović
Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
Digital Media Forensic Detection
preprint

Only Means Only: what a harmonization benchmark score averages over

Imad Buljić, Delaida Muminović
preprint en

Abstract

Image harmonization methods adjust the colour and lighting of an object pasted into a photograph so that it looks native to its new scene, and they are ranked by average error on one benchmark whose test images are real photographs with one object recoloured. One photograph can yield several such test images, and the benchmark promises that no photograph appears in both the training and the test split. We find that 1,399 photographs do, and the composites built on them are a quarter of the test set. Duplicate checks over file names or bytes miss this, because every composite is a different file. On that quarter the three methods we score end to end read two to five times lower error than on the rest, but most of the gap is composition rather than the sharing: the shared composites come almost entirely from one of the benchmark's four source collections, and inside that collection the gap falls to about one and a half times. An official score is therefore an average over two populations, mixed in a proportion the benchmark does not report. We release a test list of 5,581 composites whose construction identities do not appear in training, with four near-duplicate pairs disclosed rather than removed, adoptable without retraining at the price of one rescore per checkpoint. We leave open whether the sharing itself changes what a model learns. Contents of this record. The paper, the supplement, the LaTeX source of both, the record metadata and the licence statement. The identity matcher, the composite-locality and sensitivity checks, the CPU tests, the official iHarmony4 lists and the corrected test list are released under the MIT license at https://github.com/Buljic/only-means-only. What this record does not contain. No dataset, no images, no masks, no model checkpoints and no third-party baseline code or weights; those are described and cited by the paper and remain under their own terms. This is a preprint. It has not been peer reviewed. Licensed CC BY 4.0.

Zenodo (CERN European Organization for Nuclear Research)
University of Zenica (BA)
Digital Media Forensic Detection
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.