Feed-forward transcutaneous spinal stimulation modulates reciprocal gait dynamics after spinal cord injury

Abstract Background Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) can enhance motor output after spinal cord injury (SCI), but continuous TSS might have limited benefit during dynamic tasks like stepping. We hypothesized that a feed-forward controlled (FFC) TSS strategy, dynamically timed to specific gait phases, would significantly improve phase-dependent muscle activation and mechanical output compared to continuous TSS. Methods Five adults with chronic thoracic SCI (AIS A/B) received multi-electrode TSS targeting the lumbosacral enlargement. Interventions were evaluated during (1) supine stepping with isometric force measurements and (2) overground stepping in a robotic exoskeleton. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded bilaterally from four lower-limb muscles. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare motor responses between continuous TSS and FFC TSS conditions. Results FFC TSS substantially outperformed continuous TSS across both tasks. During supine stepping, FFC TSS increased isometric swing-phase knee extension force by up to 309% and ankle dorsiflexion force by 151% relative to continuous TSS. During overground stepping, FFC TSS amplified stance-phase rectus femoris activation by 352% compared to continuous TSS. Crucially, when compared to continuous TSS, FFC TSS significantly reduced antagonistic co-contraction ratios at the knee (from 104% to 69%) and ankle (from 102% to 69%) during swing phases, restoring reciprocal dynamics. Furthermore, FFC TSS significantly increased the Phase Selectivity Index across the majority of recorded muscles in both tasks ( p < 0.05), demonstrating superior spatial and temporal targeting compared to the tonic interference induced by continuous TSS. Conclusions Gait-synchronized FFC TSS more effectively engages functional muscle synergies than continuous stimulation. By suppressing antagonistic co-contraction and delivering temporally precise, phase-specific activation, FFC TSS addresses key limitations of conventional continuous paradigms, representing a critical step forward in optimizing non-invasive neuromodulation for dynamic motor recovery.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s12984-026-02130-3
Primary Topic
Spinal Cord Injury Research
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Feed-forward transcutaneous spinal stimulation modulates reciprocal gait dynamics after spinal cord injury

Argyrios Stampas, Teresa Kaldis, Dimitry G. Sayenko, Alexander G. Steele et al.
Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Spinal Cord Injury Research
article

Feed-forward transcutaneous spinal stimulation modulates reciprocal gait dynamics after spinal cord injury

Argyrios Stampas, Teresa Kaldis, Dimitry G. Sayenko, Alexander G. Steele, Spencer Turner, Jeonghoon Oh, Valerie Dietz, Justin Wenzlawsh, Catherine A. Martin
article en

Abstract

Abstract Background Transcutaneous spinal stimulation (TSS) can enhance motor output after spinal cord injury (SCI), but continuous TSS might have limited benefit during dynamic tasks like stepping. We hypothesized that a feed-forward controlled (FFC) TSS strategy, dynamically timed to specific gait phases, would significantly improve phase-dependent muscle activation and mechanical output compared to continuous TSS. Methods Five adults with chronic thoracic SCI (AIS A/B) received multi-electrode TSS targeting the lumbosacral enlargement. Interventions were evaluated during (1) supine stepping with isometric force measurements and (2) overground stepping in a robotic exoskeleton. Electromyography (EMG) was recorded bilaterally from four lower-limb muscles. Linear mixed-effects models were used to compare motor responses between continuous TSS and FFC TSS conditions. Results FFC TSS substantially outperformed continuous TSS across both tasks. During supine stepping, FFC TSS increased isometric swing-phase knee extension force by up to 309% and ankle dorsiflexion force by 151% relative to continuous TSS. During overground stepping, FFC TSS amplified stance-phase rectus femoris activation by 352% compared to continuous TSS. Crucially, when compared to continuous TSS, FFC TSS significantly reduced antagonistic co-contraction ratios at the knee (from 104% to 69%) and ankle (from 102% to 69%) during swing phases, restoring reciprocal dynamics. Furthermore, FFC TSS significantly increased the Phase Selectivity Index across the majority of recorded muscles in both tasks ( p < 0.05), demonstrating superior spatial and temporal targeting compared to the tonic interference induced by continuous TSS. Conclusions Gait-synchronized FFC TSS more effectively engages functional muscle synergies than continuous stimulation. By suppressing antagonistic co-contraction and delivering temporally precise, phase-specific activation, FFC TSS addresses key limitations of conventional continuous paradigms, representing a critical step forward in optimizing non-invasive neuromodulation for dynamic motor recovery.

Journal of NeuroEngineering and Rehabilitation
Houston Methodist (US), Memorial Hermann Institute for Rehabilitation and Research Foundation (US)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Spinal Cord Injury Research
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.