WBRT Plus SIB in Patients with Brain Metastases: Association with Longer Overall Survival and Safety Outcomes in a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Objective: To compare the efficacy, survival benefits, and safety of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone versus WBRT combined with simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT+SIB) for patients with brain metastases. Methods: A total of 100 patients treated from 2017 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor response was assessed per RECIST 1.1. Survival differences were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic value and stability of WBRT+SIB. Results: The WBRT+SIB group exhibited numerically higher objective response and disease control rates without statistical significance. With a median follow-up of 31.0 months, WBRT+SIB significantly prolonged median overall survival (11.0 vs. 8.0 months, p = 0.011) and improved 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates. After adjusting for multiple confounders, WBRT+SIB independently reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27–0.97, p = 0.039). Subgroup analyses were exploratory; therefore, consistent survival advantages across strata cannot be confirmed. No significant differences in acute, subacute, or late neurotoxicity, including radiation-induced brain necrosis, were found between the two groups. Conclusions: WBRT+SIB was associated with longer overall survival compared with WBRT alone, without a significant increase in the incidence of radiotherapy-related adverse events. Although ORR and DCR were numerically higher in the WBRT+SIB group, these differences were not statistically significant. Given the limitations of this exploratory study, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require validation in prospective randomized trials.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Cancers
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.3390/cancers18203320
Primary Topic
Brain Metastases and Treatment
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

WBRT Plus SIB in Patients with Brain Metastases: Association with Longer Overall Survival and Safety Outcomes in a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Guixiang Liao, Zibo Tang, Juan Fan
Cancers
Brain Metastases and Treatment
article

WBRT Plus SIB in Patients with Brain Metastases: Association with Longer Overall Survival and Safety Outcomes in a Single-Center Retrospective Analysis

Guixiang Liao, Zibo Tang, Juan Fan
article en

Abstract

Objective: To compare the efficacy, survival benefits, and safety of whole-brain radiotherapy (WBRT) alone versus WBRT combined with simultaneous integrated boost (WBRT+SIB) for patients with brain metastases. Methods: A total of 100 patients treated from 2017 to 2022 were retrospectively analyzed. Tumor response was assessed per RECIST 1.1. Survival differences were compared using the Kaplan–Meier method and log-rank test. Multivariate Cox regression and subgroup analyses were performed to evaluate the prognostic value and stability of WBRT+SIB. Results: The WBRT+SIB group exhibited numerically higher objective response and disease control rates without statistical significance. With a median follow-up of 31.0 months, WBRT+SIB significantly prolonged median overall survival (11.0 vs. 8.0 months, p = 0.011) and improved 1-, 2-, and 3-year survival rates. After adjusting for multiple confounders, WBRT+SIB independently reduced mortality risk (HR = 0.51, 95% CI: 0.27–0.97, p = 0.039). Subgroup analyses were exploratory; therefore, consistent survival advantages across strata cannot be confirmed. No significant differences in acute, subacute, or late neurotoxicity, including radiation-induced brain necrosis, were found between the two groups. Conclusions: WBRT+SIB was associated with longer overall survival compared with WBRT alone, without a significant increase in the incidence of radiotherapy-related adverse events. Although ORR and DCR were numerically higher in the WBRT+SIB group, these differences were not statistically significant. Given the limitations of this exploratory study, these findings should be considered hypothesis-generating and require validation in prospective randomized trials.

CancersVol. 18(20)
Southern University of Science and Technology (CN), Southern Medical University Shenzhen Hospital (CN), Shenzhen Second People's Hospital (CN)
Good health and well-being
Openalex Percentile: Top 13%
Brain Metastases and Treatment
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.