Afterword: the ecological challenge: international crime or systemic transformation?

In this afterword, the appeal of proposals to recognise ecocide as an international crime are acknowledged as representing a significant response to the ecological crisis. The afterword argues that that current proposals are, however, structurally limited and risk obscuring the systemic causes of ecological destruction. By concentrating on discrete events and individual perpetrators, criminalisation diverts attention from the everyday, normalised forms of ecocide produced by capitalism, state – corporate collaboration, and unequal core – periphery relations. Falk contends that international criminal law, particularly given its inability to hold states and corporations accountable, cannot address the depth or persistence of the ecological crisis. Drawing on his earlier work on environmental warfare, coloniality, and intergenerational harm, he calls for a shift from event-oriented legal remedies to a process-oriented political project of systemic transformation. The afterword concludes that meaningful resistance to ecocide requires reimagining political economy beyond capitalist imperatives, seeking ecologically grounded, egalitarian, and democratic alternatives.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Environmental Politics
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/09644016.2026.2696669
Primary Topic
International Environmental Law and Policies
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Afterword: the ecological challenge: international crime or systemic transformation?

Richard Falk
Environmental Politics
International Environmental Law and Policies
article

Afterword: the ecological challenge: international crime or systemic transformation?

Richard Falk
article en

Abstract

In this afterword, the appeal of proposals to recognise ecocide as an international crime are acknowledged as representing a significant response to the ecological crisis. The afterword argues that that current proposals are, however, structurally limited and risk obscuring the systemic causes of ecological destruction. By concentrating on discrete events and individual perpetrators, criminalisation diverts attention from the everyday, normalised forms of ecocide produced by capitalism, state – corporate collaboration, and unequal core – periphery relations. Falk contends that international criminal law, particularly given its inability to hold states and corporations accountable, cannot address the depth or persistence of the ecological crisis. Drawing on his earlier work on environmental warfare, coloniality, and intergenerational harm, he calls for a shift from event-oriented legal remedies to a process-oriented political project of systemic transformation. The afterword concludes that meaningful resistance to ecocide requires reimagining political economy beyond capitalist imperatives, seeking ecologically grounded, egalitarian, and democratic alternatives.

Environmental Politics
Princeton University (US)
Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 9%
International Environmental Law and Policies
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.