To Show or to Shield: Twin Cities News Media’s Gatekeeping of the George Floyd Video

Through the lens of gatekeeping, this study investigates Twin Cities news editors’ decision-making regarding publication of the video of George Floyd’s murder. Ten in-depth interviews were conducted with editors, news directors, and executive producers at five Twin Cities television and newspaper outlets. The study reveals that some gatekeeping procedures remain unchanged from pre-social media days. However, editors are increasingly reliant on user-generated visual content, particularly when it counters an institutional authority’s narrative. Overall, the findings suggest editors still consider themselves active gatekeepers, even as they contend with emerging technologies and evolving ethical considerations. The findings also reveal editors are using a “trauma rubric,” rather than just the traditional “Breakfast Test,” for a more nuanced approach to handling graphic content.

Authors

Publication Details

Journal
Visual Communication Quarterly
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1080/15551393.2026.2703465
Primary Topic
Media Studies and Communication
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

To Show or to Shield: Twin Cities News Media’s Gatekeeping of the George Floyd Video

Deborah McClure Pastner
Visual Communication Quarterly
Media Studies and Communication
article

To Show or to Shield: Twin Cities News Media’s Gatekeeping of the George Floyd Video

Deborah McClure Pastner
article en

Abstract

Through the lens of gatekeeping, this study investigates Twin Cities news editors’ decision-making regarding publication of the video of George Floyd’s murder. Ten in-depth interviews were conducted with editors, news directors, and executive producers at five Twin Cities television and newspaper outlets. The study reveals that some gatekeeping procedures remain unchanged from pre-social media days. However, editors are increasingly reliant on user-generated visual content, particularly when it counters an institutional authority’s narrative. Overall, the findings suggest editors still consider themselves active gatekeepers, even as they contend with emerging technologies and evolving ethical considerations. The findings also reveal editors are using a “trauma rubric,” rather than just the traditional “Breakfast Test,” for a more nuanced approach to handling graphic content.

Visual Communication Quarterly
Openalex Percentile: Top 5%
Media Studies and Communication
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.