Does entrepreneurship policy reform institutional conditions? Evidence from India’s Startup India programme

Abstract This study examines the association between India’s Startup India programme, a comprehensive entrepreneurship policy launched in January 2016, and India’s institutional regulatory environment, operationalised through World Bank Ease of Doing Business rankings. A three-stage quasi-experimental design is applied to a panel of ten emerging economies spanning 2006–2020, with India as the sole treated unit. Principal component analysis orthogonalises seven ecosystem health covariates to remove inter-variable correlation, propensity score matching constructs a counterfactual control group from nine institutionally comparable economies classified under International Monetary Fund and Morgan Stanley Capital International emerging market frameworks, and a difference-in-differences estimation isolates the policy-attributable component of India’s post-2016 ranking improvement, with cluster-robust standard errors applied to address serial correlation. Under the parallel trends and common support assumptions of this framework, Startup India is associated with an approximately 58-rank improvement in India’s ranking relative to matched control economies ( β = − 58.14, p < 0.001), after controlling for global time trends and time-invariant country characteristics. A statistically significant pre-trend result ( p = 0.002) is disclosed transparently; this weakens confidence in the parallel trends assumption underlying the design, and the direction of any resulting bias is not established by the current analysis. The study offers one of the first country-level evaluations of a national entrepreneurship policy using this approach, evidencing that policy-induced institutional reform shocks produce statistically detectable regulatory outcomes within a four-year window. Findings are bounded by the de jure nature of the ranking measure, the single-treated-unit design, and the absence of sub-national heterogeneity analysis.

Authors

Institutions

Publication Details

Journal
Future Business Journal
Published
2026-10-15
DOI
https://doi.org/10.1186/s43093-026-01023-0
Primary Topic
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
Type
article
Field-Weighted Citation Impact
0.00
Controls
|||
ALL TIME
JAN
FEB
MAR
APR
MAY
JUN
JUL
AUG
SEP
OCT
article

Does entrepreneurship policy reform institutional conditions? Evidence from India’s Startup India programme

Smita Kashiramka, Gourav Aggarwal
Future Business Journal
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
article

Does entrepreneurship policy reform institutional conditions? Evidence from India’s Startup India programme

Smita Kashiramka, Gourav Aggarwal
article en

Abstract

Abstract This study examines the association between India’s Startup India programme, a comprehensive entrepreneurship policy launched in January 2016, and India’s institutional regulatory environment, operationalised through World Bank Ease of Doing Business rankings. A three-stage quasi-experimental design is applied to a panel of ten emerging economies spanning 2006–2020, with India as the sole treated unit. Principal component analysis orthogonalises seven ecosystem health covariates to remove inter-variable correlation, propensity score matching constructs a counterfactual control group from nine institutionally comparable economies classified under International Monetary Fund and Morgan Stanley Capital International emerging market frameworks, and a difference-in-differences estimation isolates the policy-attributable component of India’s post-2016 ranking improvement, with cluster-robust standard errors applied to address serial correlation. Under the parallel trends and common support assumptions of this framework, Startup India is associated with an approximately 58-rank improvement in India’s ranking relative to matched control economies ( β = − 58.14, p < 0.001), after controlling for global time trends and time-invariant country characteristics. A statistically significant pre-trend result ( p = 0.002) is disclosed transparently; this weakens confidence in the parallel trends assumption underlying the design, and the direction of any resulting bias is not established by the current analysis. The study offers one of the first country-level evaluations of a national entrepreneurship policy using this approach, evidencing that policy-induced institutional reform shocks produce statistically detectable regulatory outcomes within a four-year window. Findings are bounded by the de jure nature of the ranking measure, the single-treated-unit design, and the absence of sub-national heterogeneity analysis.

Future Business JournalVol. 12(1)
O. P. Jindal Global University (IN), Indian Institute of Technology Delhi (IN)
Decent work and economic growth, Industry, innovation and infrastructure, Peace, justice, and strong institutions
Openalex Percentile: Top 8%
Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences
AI Navigator

Ask Laika to Summarize, Analyze, and Connect papers live on the map.

Summarize Papers & Methodologies

Extract key findings, datasets, and comparative methods across publications.

Benchmark Rankings & Visual Analytics

Rank top research institutions, authors, funders, topics, and journals by Field-Weighted Citation Impact (FWCI) and paper volume with instant charts.

Connect Distant Disciplines

Bridge topological clusters on the map to find hidden collaborative intersections.